JSTOR

No Access
You are not currently logged in through a participating institution or individual account. See access options for more information.

Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reported Religious Attendance

Stanley Presser and Linda Stinson
American Sociological Review
Vol. 63, No. 1 (Feb., 1998), pp. 137-145
Published by: American Sociological Association
Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657486
found banner=Shelf_CDST_PSS
PreviewView Full Screen
Page 137 of American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, Feb., 1998
End of preview. Get access to this entire item.
American Sociological Review © 1998 American Sociological Association
Abstract:

Compared to conventional interviewer-administered questions about attendance at religious services, self-administered items and time-use items should minimize social desirability pressures. In fact, they each reduce claims of weekly religious attendance by about one-third. This difference in measurement approach does not generally affect associations between attendance and demographic characteristics. It does, however, alter the observed trend in religious attendance over time: In contrast to the almost constant attendance rate recorded by conventional interviewer-administered items, approaches minimizing social desirability bias reveal that weekly attendance has declined continuously over the past three decades. These results provide support for the hypothesis that America has become more secularized, and they demonstrate the role of mode of administration in reducing measurement error.