Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Regret: A Model of Its Antecedents and Consequences in Consumer Decision Making

Michael Tsiros and Vikas Mittal
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 26, No. 4 (March 2000), pp. 401-417
Published by: Oxford University Press
DOI: 10.1086/209571
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/209571
Page Count: 17
  • Get Access
  • Download ($14.00)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Regret: A Model of Its Antecedents and Consequences in Consumer Decision Making
Preview not available

Abstract

The article develops a model of regret and tests it via four studies. Study 1 develops a multi‐item measure of regret and distinguishes it from satisfaction. It also shows that, while satisfaction directly influences both repurchase and complaint intentions, regret directly influences only repurchase intentions, and its effect on complaint intentions is fully mediated via satisfaction. Study 2 examines the antecedents and moderators of regret. It shows that regret is experienced even in the absence of information on a better‐forgone outcome. Furthermore, the moderating effect of three situation‐specific characteristics (outcome valence, status quo preservation, and reversibility of the outcome) is examined. Studies 3 and 4 examine the cognitive process underlying the experiencing of regret in the absence of information on a better‐forgone outcome. Generation of counterfactuals is identified as the cognitive mechanism that engenders regret. Results show that counterfactuals are most likely to be generated when the chosen outcome is negative and not the status quo.

Page Thumbnails