Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Risk, Duration, and Capital Budgeting: New Evidence on Some Old Questions

Bradford Cornell
The Journal of Business
Vol. 72, No. 2 (April 1999), pp. 183-200
DOI: 10.1086/209609
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/209609
Page Count: 18
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

In a provocative article Campbell and Mei suggest that systematic risk arises not because of correlation between a company's cash flow and the market return but primarily because of common variation in expected returns. If true, the Campbell‐Mei hypothesis has important implications for capital budgeting, particularly at high‐technology companies that have long duration, idiosyncratic investment projects. This article presents some new evidence related to the Campbell‐Mei hypothesis and then evaluates the impact of the hypothesis with a case study of Amgen Corporation.