You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comparative Shoot Development and Evolution in the Lemnaceae
Gordon D. Lemon and Usher Posluszny
International Journal of Plant Sciences
Vol. 161, No. 5 (September 2000), pp. 733-748
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/314298
Page Count: 16
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Shoot development in three duckweed (Lemnaceae) species (Spirodela polyrhiza, Lemna minor, Wolffia borealis) was studied and compared. Duckweed shoots are extremely reduced, and no evidence of a shoot apical meristem was seen during development. Duckweed shoots generally consist of a single unit (a frond) that is interpreted as a developmental hybrid (of leaf and stem origin) and may best be described and conceptualized as a metameric unit (an internode and associated node with its appendages). In the pocket(s) of older fronds, successive buds arise from meristematic tissue at the base of the previous bud. This bud development appears homologous to supernumerary bud development (multiple buds at a node) that occurs in Pistia stratiotes. First‐formed buds and pockets develop from tissue on the dorsal surface near the base of frond primordia. We suggest that the morphology of Lemnaceae plants can be understood as a result of the progressive simplification of shoots from Spirodela to Lemna to Wolffia, all of which have evolved from a Pistia‐like shoot system. Understanding the shoot architecture of duckweeds has helped to clarify the growth potential of these prolific plants.
© 2000 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.