Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts

David B. Mustard
The Journal of Law & Economics
Vol. 44, No. 1 (April 2001), pp. 285-314
DOI: 10.1086/320276
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/320276
Page Count: 30
Subjects: Business Economics Law
Find more content in these subjects: Business Economics Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines 77,236 federal offenders sentenced under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and concludes the following. First, after controlling for extensive criminological, demographic, and socioeconomic variables, I found that blacks, males, and offenders with low levels of education and income receive substantially longer sentences. Second, disparities are primarily generated by departures from the guidelines, rather than differential sentencing within the guidelines. Departures produce about 55 percent of the black‐white difference and 70 percent of the male‐female difference. Third, although black‐white disparities occur across offenses, the largest differences are for drug trafficking. The Hispanic‐white disparity is generated primarily by those convicted of drug trafficking and firearm possession/trafficking. Last, blacks and males are also less likely to get no prison term when that option is available; less likely to receive downward departures; and more likely to receive upward adjustments and, conditioned on having a downward departure, receive smaller reductions than whites and females.

Notes and References

This item contains 37 references.

Bibliography
  • ['Albonetti, Celesta A. “Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991–1992.” Law and Society Review 31 (1997): 789–822.']
  • ['Anderson, James M.; Kling, Jeffrey R.; and Stith, Kate. “Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and after the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1999): 271–308.']
  • ['Borjas, George J. “The Politics of Employment Discrimination in the Federal Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law and Economics 25 (1982): 271–99.']
  • ['Burns, James B.; Elden, Barry Rand; and Blanchard, Brian W. “We Make the Better Target (but the Guidelines Shifted Power from the Judiciary to Congress, Not from the Judiciary to the Prosecution).” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (1997): 1317–35.']
  • ['Clark, Ramsey. Crime in America: Observations on Its Nature, Causes, Prevention, and Control. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1970.']
  • ['Cole, Kevin. “The Empty Idea of Sentencing Disparity.” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (1997): 1336–41.']
  • ['Darity, William A., Jr., and Mason, Patrick L. “Evidence on Discrimination in Employment: Codes of Color, Codes of Gender.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 2 (1998): 63–90.']
  • ['Frank, Laura. “Equal Crime, but Not Equal Time.” Tennessean (September 24, 1995), p. A1.']
  • ['Gershman, Bennett L. “The New Prosecutors.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 53 (1992): 393–438.']
  • ['Green, Edward. “Research on Disparities.” In Crime and Justice. Vol. 2. The Criminal in the Arms of the Law. Edited by Leon Radzinowicz and Marvin E. Wolfgang, pp. 529–39. New York: Basic Books Inc., 1971.']
  • ['Hagan, John. “Extra‐legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint.” Law and Society Review 8 (1974): 357–84.']
  • ['Hofer, Paul J.; Blackwell, Kevin R.; and Ruback, R. Barry. “The Effect of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on Inter‐judge Sentencing Disparity.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90 (1999): 239–322.']
  • ['Kessler, Daniel P., and Piehl, Anne Morrison. “The Role of Discretion in the Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 14 (1998): 256–76.']
  • ['Kleck, Gary. “Racial Discrimination in Criminal Sentencing: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence with Additional Evidence on the Death Penalty.” American Sociological Review 46 (1981): 783–805.']
  • ['LaCasse, Chantale, and Payne, A. Abigail. “Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences: Do Defendants Bargain in the Shadow of the Judge?” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1999): 245–69.']
  • ['Ladd, Helen F. “Evidence on Discrimination in Mortgage Lending.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 2 (1998): 41–62.']
  • ['Lott, John R., Jr. “The Effect of Conviction on the Legitimate Income of Criminals.” Economics Letters 34 (1990): 381–85.']
  • ['Lott, John R., Jr. “Do We Punish High Income Criminals Too Heavily?” Economic Inquiry 30 (1992): 583–608.']
  • ['Mansnerus, Laura. “Sometimes the Punishment Fits the Gender.” New York Times (November 16, 1997), Section 4, p. 1.']
  • ['McDonald, Douglas C., and Carlson, Kenneth E. Sentencing in the Federal Courts: Does Race Matter? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, 1993.']
  • ['Meade, Jose, and Waldfogel, Joel. “Do Sentencing Guidelines Raise the Cost of Punishment?” Working Paper No. W6361. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1998.']
  • ['Morvillo, Robert G., and Bohrer, Barry A. “Checking the Balance: Prosecutorial Power in an Age of Expansive Legislation.” American Criminal Law Review 32 (1995): 137–56.']
  • ['Overby, Andrew. “Discrimination against Minority Groups.” In Crime and Justice. Vol. 2. The Criminal in the Arms of the Law. Edited by Leon Radzinowicz and Marvin E. Wolfgang, pp. 569–81. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1971.']
  • ['Payne, A. Abigail. “Does Inter‐judge Disparity Really Matter? An Analysis of the Effects of Sentencing Reforms in Three Federal District Courts.” International Review of Law and Economics 17 (1997): 337–66.']
  • ['Raeder, Myra S. “Gender and Sentencing: Single Moms, Battered Women, and Other Sex‐based Anomalies in the Gender‐Free World of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Pepperdine Law Review 20 (1993): 905–90.']
  • ['Schulhofer, Stephen J., and Nagel, Ilene H. “Plea Negotiations under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Guideline Circumvention and Its Dynamics in the Post‐Mistretta Period.” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (1997): 1284–1316.']
  • ['Sellin, Thorsten. “The Negro Criminal: A Statistical Note.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 140 (1928): 52–64.']
  • ['Sisk, Gregory C.; Heise, Michael; and Morriss, Andrew P. “Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning.” New York University Law Review 73 (1998): 1377–1500.']
  • ['Stith, Kate, and Cabranes, Jose A. “Judging under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (1997): 1247–83.']
  • ['Stith, Kate, and Cabranes, Jose A. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.']
  • ['Sutherland, Edwin H., and Cressey, Donald R. Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1970.']
  • ['Tompkins, Dorothy L. Sentencing the Offender: A Bibliography. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Governmental Studies, 1971.']
  • ['Tonry, Michael H. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.']
  • ['Tonry, Michael. “Sentencing Guidelines and Their Effects.” In The Sentencing Commission and Its Guidelines. Edited by Andrew von Hirsch, Kay A. Knapp, and Michael Tonry. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987.']
  • ['United States Sentencing Commission. Guidelines Manual. Section 3E1.1. Washington, D.C.: United States Sentencing Commission, 1989.']
  • ['United States Sentencing Commission. Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences [Computer file]. 5th release. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Sentencing Commissioner [producer]; Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter‐university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1993.']
  • ['Yinger, John. “Evidence on Discrimination in Consumer Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 2 (1998): 23–40.']