Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

A Positive Model of Earnings Forecasts: Top Down versus Bottom Up

Masako N. Darrough and Thomas Russell
The Journal of Business
Vol. 75, No. 1 (January 2002), pp. 127-152
DOI: 10.1086/323507
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/323507
Page Count: 26
Subjects: Finance Business
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
A Positive Model of Earnings Forecasts: Top Down versus Bottom Up
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

This article analyzes the behavior of two groups of corporate earnings forecasters: analysts, who follow individual company fortunes, and market strategists, who predict earnings for various company aggregates. Using data for two market indices, the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average, we document that bottom‐up forecasts are systematically more optimistic than top‐down forecasts made by strategists. This difference is not driven by the difference in the forecast target. This finding may be explained by the incentives that analysts face and/or by cognitive bias.

Notes and References

This item contains 31 references.

References
  • ['Barberis, N.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. 1998. A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics 49 (September): 307–43.']
  • ['Bernard, V. L. 1993. Stock price reactions to earnings announcement: A summary of recent anomalous evidence and possible explanations. In R. Thaler (ed.), Advances in Behavioral Finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.']
  • ['Bernard, V. L., and Thomas, J. K. 1990. Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13 (December): 305–40.']
  • ['Brown, L. D. 1996. Analyst forecasting errors and their implications for security analysis: An alternative perspective. Financial Analysts Journal 52 (January/February): 40–47.']
  • ['Brown, L. D. 1997. Earnings surprise research: Synthesis and perspectives. Financial Analysts Journal 53 (March/April): 13–19.']
  • ['Brown, L. D. 2000. Managerial behavior and the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Working paper. Atlanta: Georgia State University.']
  • ['Brown, Lawrence D., ed. 1996. I/B/E/S Research Bibliography. 5th ed. New York: I/B/E/S International, Inc.']
  • ['Burgstahler, D., and Dichev, I. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (December): 99–126.']
  • ['Butler, K. C., and Lang, L. H. P. 1991. The forecast accuracy of individual analysts: Evidence of systematic optimism and pessimism. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 150–56.']
  • ['Daniel, K.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Subrahmanyam, A. 1998. Investor psychology and security market under‐ and over‐reactions. Journal of Finance 53 (December): 1839–85.']
  • ['Darrough, M. N., and Russell, T. 2000. A behavioral model of earnings forecasts: Top down versus bottom up. Working paper. New York: Baruch College.']
  • ['Das, S.; Levine, C.; and Sivaramakrishnan, K. 1998. Earnings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecast. Accounting Review 73 (April): 277–94.']
  • ['De Bondt, W., and Thaler, R. 1990. Do security analysts overreact? American Economic Review 80 (May): 52–57.']
  • ['Degeorge, F.; Patel, J.; and Zeckhauser, R. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72 (January): 1–33.']
  • ['Diebold, F. 1998. The past, present, and future of macroeconomic forecasting. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12:175–92.']
  • ["Dugar, A., and Nathan, S. 1995. The effect of investment banking relationships on financial analysts' earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Fall): 131–60."]
  • ['Easterwood, J. C., and Nutt, S. N. 1999. Inefficiency in analysts’ earnings forecasts: Systematic misreaction or systematic optimism? Journal of Finance 54 (October): 1777–97.']
  • ['Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. New York: Prentice‐Hall.']
  • ['Hassell, J. M., and Jennings, R. H. 1986. Relative forecast accuracy and the timing of earnings forecast announcements. Accounting Review 61 (January): 58–75.']
  • ['Kahneman, D., and Lovallo, D. 1993. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science 39 (January): 17–31.']
  • ['Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. 1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80:237–51.']
  • ['Kasznik, R., and McNichols, M. 1999. Does meeting expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. Working paper. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University.']
  • ['McNichols, M., and O’Brien, P. C. 1997. Self‐selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research 35, suppl.:S167–S199.']
  • ['Norris, Floyd. 1997. A decade and a bull ride later, complacency reigns. New York Times (October 19).']
  • ['O’Brien, P. 1990. Forecast accuracy of individual analysts in nine industries. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Autumn): 286–304.']
  • ['Richardson, S.; Teoh, S. H.; and Wysocki, P. 1999. Tracking analysts’ forecasts over the annual earnings horizon: Are analysts’ forecasts optimistic or pessimistic? Working paper. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Business School.']
  • ['Schipper, K. 1991. Commentary: Analysts’ forecasts. Accounting Horizon 5 (December): 105–21.']
  • ['Skantz, T., and Pierce, B. 2000. Analyst forecasts and analyst actuals in the presence of nonrecurring gains and losses: Evidence of inconsistency. Advances in Accounting 14:221–44.']
  • ['Spragins, Ellyn E. 1998. This love could hurt. Newsweek (March 23).']
  • ['Williams, P.; Moyes, G.; and Park, K. 1996. Factors affecting earnings forecast revisions for the buy‐side and sell‐side analyst. Accounting Horizons 10 (September): 112–21.']
  • ['Wooley, Suzanne. 1998. Skittish bulls. Business Week (May 11).']