You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Individual Covariation in Life‐History Traits: Seeing the Trees Despite the Forest
Emmanuelle Cam, William A. Link, Evan G. Cooch, Jean‐Yves Monnat and Etienne Danchin
The American Naturalist
Vol. 159, No. 1 (January 2002), pp. 96-105
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/324126
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: We investigated the influence of age on survival and breeding rates in a long‐lived species Rissa tridactyla using models with individual random effects permitting variation and covariation in fitness components among individuals. Differences in survival or breeding probabilities among individuals are substantial, and there was positive covariation between survival and breeding probability; birds that were more likely to survive were also more likely to breed, given that they survived. The pattern of age‐related variation in these rates detected at the individual level differed from that observed at the population level. Our results provided confirmation of what has been suggested by other investigators: within‐cohort phenotypic selection can mask senescence. Although this phenomenon has been extensively studied in humans and captive animals, conclusive evidence of the discrepancy between population‐level and individual‐level patterns of age‐related variation in life‐history traits is extremely rare in wild animal populations. Evolutionary studies of the influence of age on life‐history traits should use approaches differentiating population level from the genuine influence of age: only the latter is relevant to theories of life‐history evolution. The development of models permitting access to individual variation in fitness is a promising advance for the study of senescence and evolutionary processes.
© 2002 by The University of Chicago.