You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Population Ecology, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Social Evolution. I. Associations among Nonrelatives
Leticia Avilés, Patrick Abbot and Asher D. Cutter
The American Naturalist
Vol. 159, No. 2 (February 2002), pp. 115-127
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/324792
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cooperation, Group size, Ecological competition, Carrying capacity, Simulations, Modeling, Population dynamics, Natural resources, Evolution, Parametric models
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: Using an individual‐based and genetically explicit simulation model, we explore the evolution of sociality within a population‐ecology and nonlinear‐dynamics framework. Assuming that individual fitness is a unimodal function of group size and that cooperation may carry a relative fitness cost, we consider the evolution of one‐generation breeding associations among nonrelatives. We explore how parameters such as the intrinsic rate of growth and group and global carrying capacities may influence social evolution and how social evolution may, in turn, influence and be influenced by emerging group‐level and population‐wide dynamics. We find that group living and cooperation evolve under a wide range of parameter values, even when cooperation is costly and the interactions can be defined as altruistic. Greater levels of cooperation, however, did evolve when cooperation carried a low or no relative fitness cost. Larger group carrying capacities allowed the evolution of larger groups but also resulted in lower cooperative tendencies. When the intrinsic rate of growth was not too small and control of the global population size was density dependent, the evolution of large cooperative tendencies resulted in dynamically unstable groups and populations. These results are consistent with the existence and typical group sizes of organisms ranging from the pleometrotic ants to the colonial birds and the global population outbreaks and crashes characteristic of organisms such as the migratory locusts and the tree‐killing bark beetles.
© 2002 by The University of Chicago.