Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Both Sides Now: Fallacies in the Genetic‐Modification Wars, Implications for Developing Countries, and Anthropological Perspectives

Glenn Davis Stone
Current Anthropology
Vol. 43, No. 4 (August/October 2002), pp. 611-630
DOI: 10.1086/341532
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/341532
Page Count: 20
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item
Both Sides Now
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 124 references.

References Cited
  • ['ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) News Online.\n 2001. Media attacked over GM food’s negative publicity. January\n 23.']
  • ['Action Aid. 2001. GM crops: Farmers’\n views and needs. London: Action Aid. [bw]']
  • ['Almekinders, C., and A. Elings. 2001. Collaboration of\n farmers and breeders: Participatory crop improvement in perspective.\n Euphytica 122:425–38. [pr]']
  • ['Altieri, M. A. 2000a. Developing\n sustainable agricultural systems for small farmers in Latin America.\n Natural Resources Forum 24:97–105.\n [maa]']
  • ['———. 2000b. The\n ecological impacts of transgenic crops on agroecosystem health.\n Ecosystem Health 6:13–23. [maa]']
  • ['Altieri, Miguel A., and Peter Rosset. 1999. Ten\n reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the\n environment, and reduce poverty in the developing world. Food First Institute\n for Food and Development Policy, October. www.\n foodfirst.org/progs/global/biotech/altieri‐11‐99.html.']
  • ['Araghi, Farshad. 2000. “The great global\n enclosure of our times: Peasants and the agrarian question at the end of the\n twentieth century,” in Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat\n to farmers, food, and the environment. Edited by F. Magdoff, J.\n Foster, and F. Buttel, pp. 145–60. New York: Monthly Review\n Press.']
  • ['Archibald, S., and P. Richards. n.d. Seeds and rights:\n New approaches to post‐war agricultural rehabilitation in Sierra Leone.\n Disasters. In press. [pr]']
  • ['Bakshi, Rajni. 2001. Food for the people. The\n Hindu, May 6.']
  • ['Barrow, L. 1986. Independent spirits:\n Spiritualism and the English plebeians, 1850–1910. London:\n Routledge and Kegan Paul. [pr]']
  • ['Bellagio Apomixis Declaration. 1998. Declaration on\n “Designing a Research Strategy for Achieving Asexual Seed Production in\n Cereals.” Rockefeller Foundation Conference, Bellagio, Italy, April\n 27–May 1.']
  • ['Benbrook, Charles M. 2001. Troubled times amid\n commercial success for Roundup Ready soybeans. AgBio Tech InfoNet Technical\n Paper Number 4.\n http://www.biotech‐info.net/troubledtimesfinal‐exsum.pdf.']
  • ['Bennett, A. L., A. Bennett, W. Green, C. Du Toit, L.\n Van Staden, T. Joffe, E. Richter, D. Brits, F. Friis, and J. Van Jaarsveld. n.d.\n Bollworm control with transgenic (Bt) cotton: First results from Africa.\n African Entomology. In press.']
  • ['Bicknell, R. A., and K. B. Bicknell 1999. Who will\n benefit from apomixis? Biotechnology and Development Monitor\n 37:17–20.']
  • ['Bray, Francesca. 2001. Are GMOs good for us? What\n anthropologists can contribute to the debate. General\n Anthropology 8(1):1–7.']
  • ['———. 2002. “How wholesome is\n that soup? The political contents of the ‘refrigerator,’” in\n Technology and human values. Edited by Roger T. Ames.\n Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. In press.']
  • ['Butler, D. 2002. Alleged flaws in gene transfer paper\n spark row over genetically modified maize. Nature\n 415:948–49. [pr]']
  • ['Charles, Daniel. 2001. Lords of the harvest:\n Biotech, big money, and the future of food. Cambridge, Mass.:\n Perseus.']
  • ['Conway, Gordon, and Gary Toenniessen. 1999. Feeding\n the world in the twenty‐first century. Nature\n 402:c55–c58.']
  • ['Council for Biotechnology Information. 2001. Plant\n biotechnology offers new opportunities for integrated pest management.\n http://www.whybiotech.com/, March 4.']
  • ['Datta, Samar. 2001. “Problems and prospects of\n India’s rice trade in a WTO regime,” in Implications of WTO\n agreements for Indian agriculture. Edited by S. Datta and S.\n Deodhar, pp. 588–629. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing.\n [rt]']
  • ['De La Perriere, R. A. B., and Franck Seuret. 2000.\n Brave new seeds: The threat of GM crops to farmers. London:\n Zed Books.']
  • ['Dennis, J. V. 1987. Farmer management of rice variety\n diversity in northern Thailand. Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.\n [pr]']
  • ['De Vries, Joseph, and Gary Toenniessen. 2001.\n Securing the harvest: Biotechnology, breeding, and seed systems for\n African crops. New York: CABI International.']
  • ['Drèze, Jean. 2001. Starving the poor: 1.\n The Hindu, February 26.']
  • ['Economic Research Service. 2000. Household\n food security in the United States, 1999.\n U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report\n 8.']
  • ['———. 2001. Impacts of\n adopting genetically engineered crops in the United States.\n Economic Research Service Report, March 7.']
  • ['Feder, Barnaby J. 1999. Plant sterility research\n inflames debate on biotechnology’s role in farming. New York\n Times, April 19.']
  • ['Fitzgerald, Deborah. 1990. The business of\n breeding: Hybrid corn in Illinois\n 1890–1940. Ithaca: Cornell\n University Press.']
  • ['Gupta, Akhil. 1998. Postcolonial developments:\n Agriculture in the making of modern India. Durham: Duke University\n Press.']
  • ['Hardin, K. 1993. The aesthetics of action:\n Continuity and change in a West African town. Washington, D.C., and\n London: Smithsonian Institution Press. [pr]']
  • ['Ingold, T. 1999. The perception of the\n environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling, and skill. London:\n Routledge. [pr]']
  • ['ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of\n Agri‐Biotech Applications). 2001. Biotechnology transfer projects:\n Africa. www.isaaa.org/projects/Africa/stratx.htm, accessed July 10.']
  • ['Ismael, Yousouf, Richard Bennett, and Stephen Morse.\n 2001. Can farmers in the developing countries benefit from modern technology?\n Experience from Makhathini Flats, Republic of South Africa. ISAAA Crop Biotech\n Brief 1 (5).\n http:///www.isaaa.org/kc/Services/media/biotech_briefs/brief5.htm.']
  • ['Jayaraman, K. S. 2001. Illicit GM cotton sparks\n corporate fury. Nature 413:555.']
  • ['Jennings, B. H. 1988. Foundations of\n international agricultural research: Science and politics\n in Mexican agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.\n [maa]']
  • ['Jusu, M. S. 1999. Management of genetic variability in\n rice (Oryza sativa L. and O. glaberrima\n Steud.) by breeders and farmers in Sierra Leone. Ph.D. diss., Wageningen\n University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. [pr]']
  • ['Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph, Jr. 1988. First the\n seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology,\n 1492–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge\n University Press.']
  • ['Knorr‐Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic\n cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard\n University Press. [pr]']
  • ['Krimsky, S., and R. P. Wrubel. 1996.\n Agricultural biotechnology and the environment: Science, policy, and\n social issues. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.\n [maa]']
  • ['Kryder, R. David, S. P. Kowalski, and A. F.\n Krattinger. 2000. The intellectual and technical property components of\n pro‐Vitamin A rice (Golden Rice): A preliminary\n freedom‐to‐operate review. Ithaca: ISAAA.']
  • ['Lambrecht, Bill. 2000. Biotech rivals team up in\n effort to sell altered food: Monsanto, others launch campaign in U.S., Canada.\n St. Louis Post‐Dispatch, April 4.']
  • ['———. 2001. Dinner at the new\n gene café. New York: St. Martin’s.']
  • ['Lappé, Frances Moore, Joseph Collins, and Peter\n Rosset. 1998. 2d edition. World hunger: Twelve myths. New York:\n Grove Press.']
  • ['Levidow, Les. 1995. “Whose ethics for\n agricultural biotechnology?” in Biopolitics: A feminist and\n ecological reader on biotechnology. Edited by Vandana Shiva and\n Ingunn Moser, pp. 175–90. London: Zed.']
  • ['Levy, A., and B. Darby. 2000. Public attitudes to GM\n foods in the U.S. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Society for\n Social Studies of Science and the European Association for Studies of Science\n and Technology, Vienna, September. [bw]']
  • ['Lewontin, Richard C. 2001. Genes in the food!\n New York Review of Books, June 21.']
  • ['Long, N., and A. Long. Editors. 1992.\n Battlefields of knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice\n in social research and development. London: Routledge.\n [pr]']
  • ['Longley, K. 2000. A social life of seeds: Local\n management of crop variability in north‐western Sierra Leone. Ph.D.\n diss., University College London, London, England. [pr]']
  • ['Macilwain, Colin. 1999. Access issues may determine\n whether agri‐biotech will help the world’s poor.\n Nature 402:341–45.']
  • ['Mc Michael, Philip. 2000. “Global food\n politics,” in Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to\n farmers, food, and the environment. Edited by F. Magdoff, J.\n Foster, and F. Buttel, pp. 125–43. New York: Monthly Review\n Press.']
  • ['Magdoff, Fred, J. B. Foster, and F. H. Buttel.\n Editors. 2000. Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers,\n food, and the environment. New York: Monthly Review\n Press.']
  • ['Marshall, Mac. Editor. 2001. Special issue on\n genetically modified foods. Medical Anthropology Quarterly\n 15(1).']
  • ['Martineau, Belinda. 2001. First fruit: the\n creation of the Flavr Savr tomato and the birth of genetically engineered\n food. New York: McGraw‐Hill.']
  • ['Moffat, Anne Simon. 1999. Crop engineering goes south.\n Science 285:370–71.']
  • ['Monbiot, George. 2002. Angel of Death. The\n Guardian (London), April 2.']
  • ['Nash, J. Madeline. 2001. Grains of hope.\n Time, February 13.']
  • ['Netting, Robert MC C. 1993. Smallholders,\n householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable\n agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.']
  • ['Nyerges, E. Editor. 1997. The ecology of\n practice: Studies of food crop production in sub‐Saharan West\n Africa. Newark: Gordon and Breach. [pr]']
  • ['Paarlberg, Robert. 2000. Genetically modified crops in\n developing countries: Promise or peril? Environment\n 42(1):19–27.']
  • ['———. 2001. The politics of\n precaution: Genetically modified crops in developing countries.\n Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.']
  • ['Parsai, Gargi. 2000. Huge wheat stocks put govn in a\n fix. The Hindu, June 4.']
  • ['Peel, J. D. Y. 1995. For who hath despised the day of\n small things? Missionary narratives and historical anthropology.\n Comparative Studies in Society and History\n 37:581–607. [pr]']
  • ['Perkins, John H. 1997. Geopolitics and the\n green revolution: Wheat, genes, and the cold war. New York: Oxford\n University Press.']
  • ['Pinstrup‐Andersen, Per, and Marc J. Cohen.\n 2000. Biotechnology and the CGIAR. Paper presented at the Friends of the Earth\n Conference, Brussels, Belgium, May.']
  • ['Pinstrup‐Andersen, Per, and Ebbe\n Schiøler. 2001. Seeds of contention: World hunger and the global\n controversy over GM crops. Washington, D.C.: International Food\n Policy Research Institute.']
  • ['Potrykus, Ingo. 2000. Open letter to Hope Shand and\n RAFI in response to their press release on “Golden Rice” from\n October 13. http://www.agbiotech‐infonet/potrykus_responds.html.']
  • ['Pray, Carle E., Danmeng MA, Jikun Huang, and Fangbin\n Qiao. 2001. Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development\n 29:813–25.']
  • ['Press Trust of India. 2001. Food panel head plays\n govt’s grain management. http://in.biz.yahoo.com/011008/26/168tz.html,\n September 30.']
  • ['Pretty, J. 1995. Regenerating agriculture:\n Policies and practices for sustainability and self‐reliance.\n London: Earthscan. [maa]']
  • ['Pretty, J., and R. Hine. 2000. Feeding the world with\n sustainable agriculture: A summary of new evidence. Final report from\n SAFE‐World Research Project. University of Essex, Colchester, England.\n [maa]']
  • ['Pretty, Jules, and Hugh Ward. 2001. Social capital and\n the environment. World Development 29:209–27.']
  • ['Purdue, Derrick. 2000. Anti‐GenetiX:\n The emergence of the anti‐GM movement. Aldershot:\n Ashgate.']
  • ['Quist, D., and I. Chapela. 2001. Transgenic DNA\n introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico.\n Nature 414:541–43. [pr]']
  • ['RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International).\n 2000. Update on Trojan trade reps, Golden Rice, and the search for higher\n ground: “Golden” goosed? News release, October 12.']
  • ['———. 2001. 2001: A seed odyssey:\n RAFI’s annual update on terminator and traitor technology. RAFI\n Communiqué, April 11.']
  • ['Rampton, Sheldon, and John Stauber. 2001.\n Trust us, we’re experts! New York:\n Tarcher/Putnam.']
  • ['Reddy, C. Rammanohar. 2001. Crime of food surpluses.\n The Hindu, September 1.']
  • ['Reddy, V. Ramakrishna. 1987. Economic history\n of Hyderabad State. Delhi: Gian Publishing House.\n [rt]']
  • ['Richards, P. 1985. Indigenous agricultural\n revolution: Ecology and food production in West Africa. London:\n Hutchinson. [pr]']
  • ['———. 1986. Coping with\n hunger: Hazard and experiment in a West African rice farming\n system. London: Allen and Unwin. [pr]']
  • ['———. 1989. “Agriculture as\n performance,” in Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural\n research. Edited by R. Chambers, A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp, pp.\n 39–51. London: Intermediate Technology.']
  • ['———. 1995. The versatility of the\n poor: Indigenous wetland management systems in Sierra Leone.\n GeoJournal 35(2):197–203. [pr]']
  • ['———. 1997. “Toward an African\n Green Revolution? An anthropology of rice research in Sierra Leone,” in\n The ecology of practice. Edited by A. Endre Nyerges, pp.\n 201–52. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.']
  • ['Rifkin, Jeremy. 1998. The biotech\n century. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.']
  • ['Rissler, J., and M. Mellon. 1996. The\n ecological risks of engineered crops. Cambridge: MIT Press.\n [maa]']
  • ['Ross, Eric B. 1998. The Malthus factor:\n Population, poverty, and politics in capitalist development.\n London: Zed.']
  • ['Rosset, Peter. 1999. Why genetically altered food\n won’t conquer hunger. New York Times, September\n 1.']
  • ['Sagar, Ambuj, Arthur Daemmrich, and Mona Ashiya. 2000.\n The tragedy of the commoners: Biotechnology and its publics.\n Nature 18:2–4.']
  • ['Scott, J. C. 1994. Weapons of the\n weak. New Haven: Yale University Press. [bw]']
  • ['Sen, Amartya. 1981. Poverty and\n famines. Oxford: Clarendon.']
  • ['Sharma, K. K., and Rodomiro Ortiz. 2000. Program for\n the application of genetic transformation for crop improvement in the\n semi‐arid tropics. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental\n Biology–Plant 36:83–92.']
  • ['Sharma, Manju. 1999. “India: Biotechnology\n research and development,” in Agricultural biotechnology and the\n poor: Proceedings of an international conference. Edited by G. J.\n Persley and M. M. Lantin, pp. 51–63. Washington, D.C.: CGIAR.']
  • ['Shiva, Vandana. 1993. Monocultures of the\n mind: Perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology. London:\n Zed.']
  • ['———. 1997. Biopiracy: The\n plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston: South End\n Press.']
  • ['———. 2000a. Stolen harvest:\n The highjacking of the global food supply. Boston: South End\n Press.']
  • ['———. 2000b. The\n “golden rice” hoax: When public relations replaces science. Widely\n posted on the internet, e.g.,\n http://www.members.tripod.com/∼ngin/11.htm.']
  • ['Steinbrecher, Ricarda A., and Pat Roy Mooney. 1998.\n Terminator technology: The threat to world food security. The\n Ecologist 28:276–79.']
  • ['Stone, Glenn Davis. 1997. Predatory sedentism:\n Intimidation and intensification in the Nigerian savanna. Human\n Ecology 25:233–42.']
  • ['———. 2001a. Theory\n of the square chicken: Advances in agricultural intensification theory.\n Asia Pacific Viewpoint 42:163–80.']
  • ['———. 2001b.\n “Agricultural change theory,” in International Encyclopedia\n of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Edited by Paul B. Baltes and\n Neil J. Smelser. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.']
  • ['———. 2002a.\n Biotechnology and suicide in India. Anthropology News\n 43(5):5.']
  • ['———. 2002b.\n Neomalthusian ethics and genetically modified agriculture: A perspective from\n ecological anthropology. Paper presented at the Wenner‐Gren Conference\n “Anthropology and Ethics,” Cabo San Lucas, Mexico.']
  • ['Stone, Glenn Davis, Robert MC C. Netting and M.\n Priscilla Stone. 1990. Seasonality, labor scheduling, and agricultural\n intensification in the Nigerian savanna. American\n Anthropologist 92:7–24.']
  • ['Stone, M. P., G. D. Stone, and R. M. Netting. 1995.\n The sexual division of labor in Kofyar agriculture. American\n Ethnologist 22:165–86.']
  • ['Swaminathan, S. 2001. Food stocks: The enduring\n paradox. The Hindu, May 1.']
  • ['Taylor, N. J., and C. M. Fauquet. 1997. Transfer of\n rice and cassava gene technologies to developing countries.\n Biotechnology International 1:239–46.']
  • ['Taylor, N. J., C. Schöpke, M. V. Masona, and C.\n M. Fauquet. 1999. Development of genetic engineering technologies in cassava\n production. Biotechnology International\n 2:268–75.']
  • ['Thro, A. M., M. Fregene, N. Taylor, C. Raemakers, J.\n Puonti‐Kaerlas, C. Schöpke, R. Visser, I. Potkyrus, C. Fauquet, W.\n Rosa, and C. Hershey. 1999. “Genetic biotechnologies and\n cassava‐based development,” in Biotechnology of food crops\n in developing countries. Edited by T. Hohn and K. M. Leisinger, pp.\n 141–85. New York: Springer Wein.']
  • ['Toro, Julio C., and C. B. Atlee. 1980.\n “Agronomic practices for cassava production: A literature review,”\n in Cassava cultural practices. Edited by E. J. Webber, J. C.\n Toro, and M. Graham, pp. 13–28. Ottawa: International Development Research\n Center.']
  • ['Traxler, Greg, S. Godoy‐Avila, J.\n Falck‐Zepeda, and J. Espinoza‐Arellano. 2001. “Transgenic\n cotton in Mexico: Economic and environmental impacts.” Proceedings\n of the 5th International Conference on Biotechnology, Ravallo,\n Italy.']
  • ['Tripp, Robert. 2001a. ‘Twixt\n cup and lip: Biotechnology and resource‐poor farmers. Nature\n Biotechnology 19:93–93.']
  • ['———. 2001b.\n Seed provision and agricultural development. London: James\n Currey.']
  • ['———. n.d. Can the public sector meet\n the challenge of private research? Food Policy. In press.\n [rt]']
  • ['Tripp, Robert, and Suresh Pal. 2001. The private\n delivery of public crop varieties: Rice in Andhra Pradesh. World\n Development 29:103–17.']
  • ['UC‐Davis. 1999. UC Davis biotech expert\n addresses World Trade Organization sessions. News release, November\n 30.']
  • ['Uphoff, N. 2002. Agroecological innovations:\n Increasing food production with participatory development. London:\n Earthscan. [maa]']
  • ['Uphoff, N., and M. A. Altieri. 1999.\n Alternatives to conventional modern agriculture for meeting world\n food needs in the next century: Report of a Bellagio Conference.\n Ithaca: Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture, and Development.\n [maa]']
  • ['Venkatesan, J. 2001. Food must reach the starving, not\n rot: S.C. The Hindu, August 21.']
  • ['Wakeford, T. 2000. Action Aid citizen’s jury\n initiative: Indian farmers judge GM crops. MS, report prepared for Action Aid,\n London. [pr]']
  • ['Watson, James L. Editor. 1997. Golden arches\n east: McDonald’s in East Asia. Stanford: Stanford University\n Press.']
  • ['Wright, A. 1984. “Innocents abroad: American\n agricultural research in Mexico,” in Meeting expectations of the\n land. Edited by W. Jackson et al., pp. 135–51. Berkeley:\n North Point Press. [maa]']
  • ['Wynne, B., et al. 2001. Public attitudes to\n agricultural biotechnologies in Europe. MS, EU project PABE: FAIR programme,\n contract CT98‐3844: DG12 ‐SSMI, Commission of the European\n Communities, D–G Research, Brussels. [bw]']
  • ['Zimmerer, K. 1996. Changing fortunes:\n Biodiversity and peasant livelihoods in the Andes. Berkeley:\n University of California Press. [pr]']

Supplements