You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Aligning Multiple Research Techniques in Cognitive Neuroscience: Why Is It Important?
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 69, No. S3 (September 2002), pp. S48-S58
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/341767
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Information processing, Lesions, Neuroimaging, Hippocampus, Memory, Memory retrieval, Prefrontal cortex, Neuroscience, Brain, Memory encoding
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract The need to align multiple experimental procedures and produce converging results so as to demonstrate that the phenomenon under investigation is real and not an artifact is a commonplace both in scientific practice and discussions of scientific methodology (Campbell and Stanley 1963; Wimsatt 1981). Although sometimes this is the purpose of aligning techniques, often there is a different purpose—multiple techniques are sought to supply different perspectives on the phenomena under investigation that need to be integrated to answer the questions scientists are asking. After introducing this function, I will illustrate it by considering three of the major techniques in cognitive neuroscience for linking cognitive function with neural structure.
Copyright 2002 by The Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.