You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Materialism and Well‐Being: A Conflicting Values Perspective
James E. Burroughs and Aric Rindfleisch
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 29, No. 3 (December 2002), pp. 348-370
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/344429
Page Count: 23
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Materialism, Discourse communities, Family values, Assessed values, Psychological stress, Anxiety, Psychological research, Psychology, Psychometrics, Happiness
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Over the past decade, materialism has emerged as an important research topic. Materialism is generally viewed as the value placed on the acquisition of material objects. Previous research finds that high levels of material values are negatively associated with subjective well‐being. However, relatively little is known about the relationship between materialism and well‐being within the broader context of an individual’s value system. In this article, we examine the relationship between material values and other important life values. In addition, we draw on values theory to examine a novel conceptualization of why materialism is antithetical to well‐being. Specifically, our theory proposes that the individual orientation of material values conflicts with collective‐oriented values, such as family values and religious values. This state of values conflict creates psychological tension, and this tension is associated with a reduced sense of well‐being. Using both a survey sample of 373 adults from across the United States and an experimental study of 120 college students, we find considerable support for this conflicting values perspective.
© 2002 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.