You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Kin Composition of Social Groups: Trading Group Size for Degree of Altruism
Leticia Avilés, Jeffrey A. Fletcher and Asher D. Cutter
The American Naturalist
Vol. 164, No. 2 (August 2004), pp. 132-144
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/422263
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Group size, Cousins, Biological altruism, Cooperation, Evolution, Ecological competition, Simulations, Arithmetic mean, Modeling, Parametric models
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: Why some social systems form groups composed of kin, while others do not, has gone largely untreated in the literature. Using an individual‐based simulation model, we explore the demographic consequences of making kinship a criterion in group formation. We find that systems where social groups consist of one‐generation breeding associations may face a serious trade‐off between degree of altruism and group size that is largely mediated by their kin composition. On the one hand, restricting groups to close kin allows the evolution of highly altruistic behaviors but may limit group size to suboptimal levels, the more severely so the smaller the intrinsic fecundity of the species and the stricter the kin admission rule. Group size requirements, on the other hand, can be met by admitting nonkin into groups, but not without limiting the degree of altruism that can evolve. As a solution to this conundrum, we show that if helping roles within groups are assigned through a lottery rather than being genetically determined, maximum degrees of altruism can evolve in groups of nonrelatives of any size. Such a “lottery” mechanism may explain reproductive and helping patterns in organisms as varied as the cellular slime molds, pleometrotic ants, and Galapagos hawks.
© 2004 by The University of Chicago.