You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:


Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss‐Averse Investors

Francisco J. Gomes
The Journal of Business
Vol. 78, No. 2 (March 2005), pp. 675-706
DOI: 10.1086/427643
Stable URL:
Page Count: 32
Subjects: Finance Business
Find more content in these subjects: Finance Business
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss‐Averse Investors
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


We present a model of portfolio choice and stock trading volume with loss‐averse investors. The demand function for risky assets is discontinuous and nonmonotonic: As wealth rises beyond a threshold, investors follow a generalized portfolio insurance strategy, which is consistent with the disposition effect. In addition, loss‐averse investors hold no stocks unless the equity premium is quite high. The elasticity of the aggregate demand curve changes substantially, depending on the distribution of wealth across investors. In an equilibrium setting, the model generates positive correlation between trading volume and stock return volatility but suggests that this relationship is nonlinear.

Notes and References

This item contains 40 references.

  • ['Andersen, T. 1996. Return volatility and trading volume. An information flow interpretation of stochastic volatility. Journal of Finance 51 (March): 169–204.']
  • ['Ang, A., G. Bekaert, and J. Liu. 2000. Why stocks might disappoint. Working paper, Columbia University, Stanford University, and UCLA.']
  • ['Barberis, N., M. Huang, and T. Santos. 2001. Prospect theory and asset prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (February): 1–53.']
  • ['Basak, S. 1995. A general equilibrium model of portfolio insurance. Review of Financial Studies 8 (Winter): 1059–1099.']
  • ['———. 2002. A comparative study of portfolio insurance. Journal of Economic Dynamics of Control 26 (July): 1217–41.']
  • ['Bekaert, G., R. J. Hodrick, and D. A. Marshall. 1997. The implication of first order risk aversion for asset market risk premiums. Journal of Monetory Economics. 40 (September): 3–39.']
  • ['Benartzi, S., and R. H. Thaler. 1995. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (February): 73–92.']
  • ['Benninga, S., and M. Blume. 1985. On The optimality of portfolio insurance. Journal of Finance 40 (December): 1341–52.']
  • ['Berkelaar, A., and R. Kouwenberg. 2001. Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion. Working paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.']
  • ['Bollerslev, T., R. Y. Chou, and K. F. Kroner. 1992. ARCH modelling in finance: A review of the theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Econometrics 52 (April–May): 5–60.']
  • ['Brock, W., and B. LeBaron. 1996. A dynamic structural model for stock return volatility and trading volume. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (February): 94–110.']
  • ['Campbell, J. Y., S. J. Grossman, and J. Wang. 1993. Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (November): 905–39.']
  • ['Epstein, L. G., and S. E. Zin. 1990. First order risk aversion and equity premium puzzle. Journal of Monetory Economics 26 (October): 387–407.']
  • ['Gallant, R., P. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, G. 1992. Stock prices and volume. Review of Financial Studies 5, no. 2: 199–242.']
  • ["Grinblatt, M., and M. Keloharju. 2000. The investment behaviour and performance of various investor types. A study of Finland's unique data set. Journal of Financial Economics 55 (January): 43–68."]
  • ['———. 2001. What makes investors trade. Journal of Finance 56 (April): 589–616.']
  • ['Grossman, S. J., and Z. Zhou. 1996. Equilibrium analysis of portfolio insurance. Journal of Finance 51 (September): 1379–1403.']
  • ['He, H., and J. Wang. 1995. Differential information and dynamic behavior of stock trading volume. Review of Financial Studies 8, no. 4:919–72.']
  • ['Heath, C., S. Huddart, and M. Lang. 1999. Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (May): 601–28.']
  • ['Jones, C., G. Kaul, and M. Lipson. 1994. Transactions, volume and volatility. Review of Financial Studies 7, no. 4: 631–51.']
  • ['Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (March): 263–91.']
  • ['Leland, H. E. 1980. Who should buy portfolio insurance? Journal of Finance 35 (May): 581–94.']
  • ['LeRoy, S. F., and R. D. Porter. 1981. The present-value relation: Tests based on implied variance bounds. Econometrica 49 (May): 555–74.']
  • ['Lien, D. 2001. A note on loss aversion and futures hedging. Journal of Futures Markets 21 (July): 681–92.']
  • ['Lien, D., and Y. Q. Wang. 2003. Disappointment aversion equilibrium in a futures market. Journal of Futures Markets 23 (February): 135–50.']
  • ['Locke, P., and S. Mann. 1999. Do professional traders exhibit loss realization aversion. Working paper, Division of Economic Analysis, Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Neeley School of Business.']
  • ['Odean, T. 1998. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance 53 (October): 1775–98.']
  • ['Rangeulova, E. 2001. Disposition effect and firm size: New evidence on individual investor trading activity. Working paper, Harvard University.']
  • ['Shalen, C. 1993. Volume, Volatility and the dispersion of beliefs. Review of Financial Studies 6, no. 2: 405–34.']
  • ['Shefrin, H., and M. Statman. 1985. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long. Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 40 (July): 777–90.']
  • ['Shiller, R. J. 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent dividends? American Economic Review 71 (June): 421–436.']
  • ['———. 1998. Human behaviour and efficiency of the financial system: Handbook of macroeconomics. Doderecht: North‐Holland.']
  • ['Shleifer, A. 1986. Do demand curves for stocks slope down? Journal of Finance 41 (July): 579–90.']
  • ['———. 1999. Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioral finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.']
  • ['Shumway, T. 1997. Explaining returns with loss aversion. Working paper, University of Michigan.']
  • ['Thaler, R. H., and E. Johnson, E. 1990. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science 36 (June): 643–60.']
  • ['Townsend, R. 1983. Forecasting the forecasting of others. Journal of Political Economy 91 (August): 546–88.']
  • ['Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representative of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (October): 297–323.']
  • ['Wang, J. 1993. A model of intertemporal asset prices under asymmetric information Review of Economic Studies 60 (April): 249–82.']
  • ['———. 1994. A model of competitive stock trading volume. Journal of Political Economy 102 (February): 127–68.']