You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Do Right‐To‐Carry Laws Deter Violent Crime?
DAN A. Black and Daniel S. Nagin
The Journal of Legal Studies
Vol. 27, No. 1 (January 1998), pp. 209-219
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/468019
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mustards, Criminal law, Violent crimes, Rape, Homicide, Coefficients, Property crimes, Crime rates, Legal evidence, Censuses
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract John R. Lott and David B. Mustard conclude that right‐to‐carry laws deter violent crime. Our reanalysis of Lott and Mustard's data provides no basis for drawing confident conclusions about the impact of right‐to‐carry laws on violent crime. We document that their results are highly sensitive to small changes in their model and sample. Without Florida in the sample, there is no detectable impact of right‐to‐carry laws on the rate of murder and rape, the two crimes that by the calculations of Lott and Mustard account for 80 percent of the social benefit of right‐to‐carry laws. A more general model based on year‐to‐year differences yields no evidence of significant impact for any type of violent crime. As a result, inference based on the Lott and Mustard model is inappropriate, and their results cannot be used responsibly to formulate public policy.
© 1998 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.