You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Is the Ninth Circuit too Large? A Statistical Study of Judicial Quality
Richard A. Posner
The Journal of Legal Studies
Vol. 29, No. 2 (June 2000), pp. 711-719
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/468090
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Judges, Federal circuit courts, Appellate courts, Federal courts, Statistical significance, En banc, Writ of certiorari, Citation analysis, Federal appellate court opinions, Legal evidence
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract This paper provides an empirical test of the claim that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has too many judges to be able to do a good job. Reversals (especially summary reversals) by the Supreme Court and citations are used as proxies for quality of judicial output. The overall conclusion is that (1) adding judgeships tends to reduce the quality of a court's output and (2) the Ninth Circuit's uniquely high rate of being summarily reversed by the Supreme Court (a) is probably not a statistical fluke and (b) may not be a product simply of that circuit's large number of judges.
© 2000 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.