You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Lethal Effects of Three‐Strikes Laws
Thomas B. Marvell and Carlisle E. Moody
The Journal of Legal Studies
Vol. 30, No. 1 (January 2001), pp. 89-106
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/468112
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Criminal law, Homicide, Prisons, Criminals, Violent crimes, Crime patterns, Regression coefficients, Criminal justice, Variable coefficients, Legal evidence
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract Three‐strikes laws provide very long prison terms for certain criminals with prior convictions of serious violent crimes. It is likely that the laws increase homicides because a few criminals, fearing the enhanced penalties, murder victims and witnesses to limit resistance and identification. With a state‐level multiple‐time‐series design, we find that the laws are associated with 10–12 percent more homicides in the short run and 23–29 percent in the long run. The impact occurs in almost all 24 states with three‐strikes laws. Furthermore, there is little evidence that the laws have any compensating crime reduction impact through deterrence or incapacitation.
© 2001 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.