You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Small Business Loan Turndowns, Personal Wealth, and Discrimination

Ken Cavalluzzo and John Wolken
The Journal of Business
Vol. 78, No. 6 (November 2005), pp. 2153-2178
DOI: 10.1086/497045
Stable URL:
Page Count: 26
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


We examine the impact of personal wealth on small business loan turndowns across demographic groups. Information on home ownership, home equity, and personal net worth, in combination with a rich set of explanatory variables, furthers our understanding of the credit market experiences of small businesses across demographic groups. We find substantial unexplained differences in denial rates between African‐American‐, Hispanic‐, Asian‐, and white‐owned firms. We find that greater personal wealth is associated with a lower probability of loan denial. However, even after controlling for personal wealth, large differences in denial rates across demographic groups remain.

Notes and References

This item contains 17 references.

  • ['Avery, R., R. Bostic, K. Samolyk. 1998. The role of personal wealth in small business finance. Journal of Banking and Finance 22:1019–61.']
  • ['Becker, G. S. 1957. The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.']
  • ['Blanchflower, D., P. Levine, and D. Zimmerman. 2003. Discrimination in the small business credit market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85:930–43.']
  • ['Bloom, D. E., B. Preiss, and J. Trussell. 1983. Mortgage lending discrimination and the decision to apply: A methodological note. AREUEA Journal 11, no. 1:97–103.']
  • ['Bostic, R., and P. Lampani. 1999. Racial differences in patterns of small business finance: The importance of local geography. Business Access to Capital and Credit, Arlington VA (March 8–9):149–79.']
  • ['Cavalluzzo, K., and L. Cavalluzzo. 1998. Market structure and discrimination: The case of small businesses. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30 (November):771–92.']
  • ['Cavalluzzo, K., L. Cavalluzzo, and J. Wolken. 2002. Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. Journal of Business 75 (October):641–80.']
  • ['Cavalluzzo, K., and J. Wolken. 2002. Small business loan turndowns, personal wealth and discrimination. Federal Reserve working paper #2002–35, Washington DC (July).']
  • ['Fairlie, R. 1999. The absence of the African‐American owned business: An analysis of the dynamics of self‐employment. Journal of Labor Economics 17, no. 1:80–108.']
  • ['Gibson, C. 1983. Financial ratios as perceived by commercial loan officers. Akron Business and Economic Review (Summer):23–27.']
  • ['Haggerty C., K. Grigorian, R. Harter, and A. Stewart. 2001. The 1998 Survey of Small Business Finance: Methodology Report. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (April).']
  • ['Mann, R. 1998. Comment on Avery, Bostic, and Samolyk. Journal of Banking and Finance 22:1062–66.']
  • ['Martell, J., P. Panichelli, R. Strauch, and S. Taylo‐Shoff. 1997. The effectiveness of scoring on low‐to‐moderate‐income and high‐minority area populations. Mimeo, Fair, Isaac and Company, Incorporated (August).']
  • ["Mester, Loretta J. 1997. What's the point of credit scoring? Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (September/October):3–16."]
  • ['1993 National Survey of Small Business Finances. 1999. Codebook for the 1993 National Survey of Small Business Finances. mimeo. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.']
  • ['1998 Survey of Small Business Finances. 2001. Codebook for the 1998 Survey of small business finances, mimeo. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.']
  • ['Oaxaca, R. 1973. Male‐female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review 14, no. 3:693–709.']