CONCISE COMMUNICATION

Biofilm Formation by and Accessory Gene Regulator Typing of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Recovered From Patients With Nosocomial Infections

Kunihiro Manago, MD; Junichiro Nishi, MD; Naoko Wakimoto, MSc; Hiroaki Miyanohara, MT; Jav Sarantuya, MD; Koichi Tokuda, MD; Mayumi Iwashita, MD; Kimie Yamamoto, MD; Masao Yoshinaga, MD; Ikuro Maruyama, MD; Yoshifumi Kawano, MD  

Drs. Manago, Nishi, Wakimoto, Sarantuya, Tokuda, Iwashita, Yamamoto, Yoshinaga, and Kawano are from the Department of Pediatrics, and Dr. Maruyama is from the Department of Laboratory and Molecular Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan. Mr. Miyanohara is from the Clinical Laboratory of Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima.

Address requests for reprints to Junichiro Nishi, Dept. of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8‐35‐1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890‐8520, Japan (nishi1@m2.kufm.kagoshima‐u.ac.jp).

The association between biofilm formation and the accessory gene regulator (agr) types of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains in our hospital were investigated. The biofilm index and the incidence of MRSA strains carrying agr‐2 in the infection group ( ) were significantly higher than were those in the carrier group ( ), suggesting that biofilm formation and agr type are associated with nosocomial MRSA infections.

Received March 13, 2004; accepted February 7, 2005; electronically published February 8, 2006.

Nosocomial infections due to methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been a serious problem in many institutions. Biofilm formation has been considered to be a virulence factor in infections associated with the use of catheters and other medical devices.1 Some reports have investigated the production of biofilm by staphylococcal strains on prosthetic medical devices2; however, to our knowledge, epidemiological analysis of biofilms produced by clinical MRSA isolates in a hospital has not been reported. We conducted a survey of MRSA‐colonized or ‐infected patients in our hospital (Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan).3 We hypothesized that MRSA isolates recovered from infection sites of patients with nosocomial infection would have higher levels of biofilm production than would isolates recovered from asymptomatic carriers.

The genetic and molecular basis of biofilm formation by staphylococci has been studied, and the accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum‐sensing system has been linked to biofilm formation by S. aureus.4 S. aureus strains can be divided into 4 major types (designated agr‐1, agr‐2, agr‐3, and agr‐4)5, 6; however, the clinical relevance of the agr type in MRSA infection has not been well described in epidemiological studies conducted in hospitals. We investigated the formation of biofilm by MRSA strains recovered from patients with nosocomial infection and from asymptomatic carriers in our hospital and evaluated the agr types of the strains.

Methods

 

Since 1999, nosocomial infections due to and colonization by MRSA have been surveyed monthly at Kagoshima University Hospital, a 700‐bed tertiary‐care hospital.3 We defined cases of colonization as those involving patients for whom culture results were positive for MRSA but for whom there was no evidence of tissue invasion. The diagnosis of nosocomial infection was based on the criteria proposed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.7 Nasal swab specimens were collected routinely for surveillance culture from patients undergoing invasive treatments, such as surgery or tracheal intubation. Culture specimens from the other sites were collected as usual for routine clinical culture. S. aureus was identified by colony morphological analysis and by coagulase testing. Resistance to methicillin was determined by subculturing the isolate on MRSA screening plates (Becton Dickinson) at 35°C for 24 hours. During a 3‐year period from 2000 through 2002, we found 121 patients who were nosocomially infected with MRSA and 287 patients who were colonized in the nose and pharynx. Because only 1 MRSA strain was selected from each patient, 121 isolates from nosocomial infection sites (the infection group) and 287 nasal or pharyngeal strains (the carrier group) were examined. The sources of the specimens in the infection group were as follows: surgical site, 49 (40.5%); sputum, 42 (34.7%); catheter, 18 (14.9%); pleural effusion, 10 (8.3%); and ascites, 2 (1.7%). The sources of the specimens in the carrier group were as follows: nasal cavity, 239 (83.3%) and pharynx, 48 (16.7%).

Biofilm formation by MRSA strains on polystyrene was quantified using the microtiter plate assay first described by Christensen et al.8 Briefly, strains were grown overnight in trypticase soy broth with 0.25% glucose. The next day, the strains were diluted 1:40 in trypticase soy broth with 0.25% glucose, and 200 μL of this suspension was inoculated in duplicate in a 96‐well, flat‐bottom, polystyrene microtiter plate and was incubated for 18 hours at 37°C without shaking. Next, the cells were decanted, and the wells were washed gently 4 times with tap water. The cells that remained in the wells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min. The wells were washed 4 times with tap water. The stained cells were resolved by the addition of 200 μL of 95% ethanol. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm by use of an ELISA plate reader. The biofilm index was defined as the optical density at 595 nm (OD595). To evaluate the reproducibility of this method, biofilm indexes of all the strains were measured twice independently by K.M. and J.N. Both authors' results correlated well with each other (correlation coefficient, 0.938; ; ).

The genotyping methods included spa typing, agr typing, pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis, mec‐hypervariable region polymerase chain reaction or sequence typing, and toxin genotyping, as described elsewhere.3 Four agr types based on the variability of agrD or agrC sequences were determined by use of the agr typing method using multiplex polymerase chain reaction, as described elsewhere.9 One universal forward primer and 4 type‐specific reverse primers were used. DNA was prepared for polymerase chain reaction by standard biochemical methods. Amplification reactions were performed in a Thermal Cycler PC 707 (ASTEC). The polymerase chain reaction products were electrophoresed on 1.2% agarose gels, and the agr type (1, 2, 3, or 4) was determined by the expected product size.

Statistical testing was performed using the Mann‐Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

 

The examined isolates were classified into 297 genotypes: 91 genotypes in the infection group and 225 genotypes in the carrier group. Nineteen genotypes were observed in both groups. The members of the same genotype in each group were eliminated, except for one representative strain, so as not to count members of the same clone repeatedly as different test samples. Finally, 91 isolates in the infection group and 225 isolates in the carrier group were evaluated for biofilm formation. The sources of the specimens in the infection group were as follows: surgical site, 36 (39.6%); sputum, 32 (35.2%); catheter, 16 (17.6%); pleural effusion 6 (6.6%), and ascites 1 (1.1%). The sources of the specimens in the carrier group were as follows: nasal cavity, 191 (84.9%) and pharynx, 34 (15.1%).

A comparison of quantitative biofilm analysis in each group is shown in panel A of the Figure. The average biofilm index in the infection group (mean ± SD, OD595; range, 0.020‐3.251 OD595) was significantly higher than that in the carrier group (mean ± SD, OD595; range, 0.001‐2.084 OD595) ( ). We defined a strongly biofilm‐producing strain as one with a biofilm index higher than 0.304 OD595, which was the 75th percentile in the carrier group. The incidence of strongly biofilm‐producing strains in the infection group (35/91 [38.5%]) was significantly higher than that in the carrier group (56/225 [24.9%]) ( ).

Figure.  A, Quantitative analysis of biofilm formation by 91 methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from nosocomial infection sites (the infection group) and 225 nasal or pharyngeal strains recovered from asymptomatic carriers (the carrier group). B, Comparison of biofilm formation among the agr types: agr‐1, ; agr‐2, ; and agr‐3, . Box plots show median and the 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. OD595, optical density at 595 nm.

Open New Window

The average biofilm index of each specimen site was as follows: surgical site, OD595 (range, 0.020‐3.251 OD595); catheter, OD595 (range, 0.036‐1.877 OD595); sputum, OD595 (range, 0.034‐2.372 OD595); pleural effusion and ascites, OD595 (range, 0.072‐0.868 OD595); nasal cavity, OD595 (range, 0.001‐2.084 OD595); and pharynx, OD595 (range, 0.003‐1.846 OD595). There was no significant difference among the specimen sites within either group.

The prevalences of agr types in both groups are shown in the Table. The prevalence of agr‐1 strains in the infection group was significantly lower than that in the carrier group ( ), whereas that of agr‐2 strains in the infection group was significantly higher than that in the carrier group ( ). No agr‐4 strains were found in this study. A comparison of biofilm index by each agr type is shown in panel B of the Figure. The biofilm index of the agr‐1 strains (mean ± SD, OD595; range, 0.001‐0.928 OD595) was significantly lower than those of the agr‐2 strains (mean ± SD, OD595; range, 0.012‐3.251 OD595) ( ) and the agr‐3 strains (mean ± SD, OD595; range, 0.011‐0.820 OD595) ( ).

Table. 
Table.  The Prevalence of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus agr Types in the Carrier and Infection Groups.

Open New Window

Discussion

 

In the present study, we found that MRSA strains recovered from patients with nosocomial infection sites were more likely to produce strong biofilm adhesions to polystyrene than were strains recovered from the nasal cavity or pharynx of asymptomatic carriers. This finding suggests that strongly biofilm‐producing MRSA strains are associated with nosocomial infection, such as surgical site infection and pneumonia. Using a tissue‐culture plate assay, Knobloch et al.10 compared the formation of biofilm by clinical S. aureus isolates recovered from patients with that by nasal S. aureus isolates recovered from healthy students. Consistent with our results, they found that significantly more clinical isolates than nasal isolates were able to form biofilms. To our knowledge, however, ours is the first report to study biofilm formation in an epidemiological study of MRSA in a hospital. Our study has the limitation of cross‐sectional approach. To investigate whether strongly biofilm‐producing MRSA strains preferentially induce nosocomial infections, further analysis, including a longitudinal study, will be needed.

Some strains in the carrier group produced strong biofilms. Previously, we reported that the prevalent genotypes in nonnasal strains causing nosocomial infections were also found in the nasal strains of asymptomatic carriers in our hospital.3 Strongly biofilm‐producing strains present in the nasal cavity may possibly cause nosocomial MRSA infections, if the carriers undergo invasive treatments. Thus, investigation of the biofilm formation of MRSA strains carried by patients preparing to undergo invasive treatments may be useful for the prevention of nosocomial infection.

The agr gene is a factor of the quorum‐sensing system in staphylococci that senses the density of bacteria.4 In our study, most of the agr‐1 strains showed poor biofilm formation, compared with agr‐2 and agr‐3 strains. We also found a lower prevalence of agr‐1 strains and a higher prevalence of agr‐2 strains in the infection group. Goerke et al.6 reported that the majority of S. aureus strains recovered from patients undergoing intubation and from patients with chronic wounds were type agr‐2, in contrast to those recovered from healthy control subjects. Our results are consistent with their finding and suggest that the agr type is associated with biofilm formation and nosocomial MRSA infection.

Acknowledgments

 

We thank the staff at Kagoshima University Hospital Clinical Laboratory for technical assistance in collecting methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.

References

 
  • 1. Reid G. Biofilms in infectious disease and on medical devices. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999; 11:223‐226; discussion 237‐239.
  • 2. Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Baldassarri L, Borsetti E, Cavedagna D, Donati E. Slime production by staphylococci isolated from prosthesis‐associated infections. New Microbiol 1999;22:337‐341.
  • 3. Nishi J, Yoshinaga M, Miyanohara H, et al. An epidemiologic survey of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus by combined use of mec‐HVR genotyping and toxin genotyping in a university hospital in Japan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23:506‐510.
  • 4. Vuong C, Saenz HL, Gotz F, Otto M. Impact of the agr quorum‐sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 2000; 182:1688‐1693.
  • 5. Jarraud S, Lyon GJ, Figueiredo AM, et al. Exfoliatin‐producing strains define a fourth agr specificity group in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:6517‐6522.
  • 6. Goerke C, Kummel M, Dietz K, Wolz C. Evaluation of intraspecies interference due to agr polymorphism in Staphylococcus aureus during infection and colonization. J Infect Dis 2003; 188:250‐256.
  • 7. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16:128‐140.
  • 8. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, et al. Adherence of coagulase‐negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22:996‐1006.
  • 9. Lina G, Boutite F, Tristan A, Bes M, Etienne J, Vandenesch F. Bacterial competition for human nasal cavity colonization: role of staphylococcal agr alleles. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69:18‐23.
  • 10. Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Rohde H, Mack D. Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl) 2002; 191:101‐106.
  • This study was financially supported by the Research Fund of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (grant 12470168).

© 2006 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.