Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Patient‐to‐Patient Transmission of Nosocomial Malaria in Italy

Maria Luisa Moro , MD, Roberto Romi , PhD, Carlo Severini , PhD, Gian Paolo Casadio , MD, Giovanni Sarta , MD, Guido Tampieri , MD, Antonio Scardovi , MD, Cinzia Pozzetti , RN, CIC and Malaria Outbreak Group
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 23, No. 6 (June 2002), pp. 338-341
DOI: 10.1086/502062
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/502062
Page Count: 4
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
Patient‐to‐Patient Transmission of Nosocomial Malaria in Italy
Preview not available

Abstract

OBJECTIVE.  To describe nosocomial transmission of malaria from patient to patient via blood exposure. PATIENTS.  A 56‐year‐old man was admitted to an Italian hospital with fever and Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia, but with no risk factors for malaria. Twenty days earlier, he had been admitted for bronchopulmonary disease to the hospital’s intensive care unit, where a woman with P. falciparum malaria acquired abroad was present. METHODS.  We reviewed both patients’ medical records and searched for mosquitoes in the hospital and on the grounds. We interviewed the staff about patient care practices potentially involving contact with blood. The genetic identities of strains were determined by genotyping of the DNA extracted from blood. RESULTS.  Molecular genotyping showed that the two strains were identical. The only invasive procedures performed on both patients by the same staff on the same shift were capillary blood sampling by finger stick, intravenous drug administration, and substitution of total parenteral nutrition bags and intravenous sets. The fingerstick device used was designed to prevent person‐to‐person transmission of blood‐borne infections, and the staff interviews did not reveal any incorrect use of aseptic techniques. The likely source of infection was identified during a training course 6 months later: a nurse reported that, when collecting blood, she placed patients’ fingers directly on the blood glucose meter, a practice she had learned from a poster advertising the device. CONCLUSIONS.  A nosocomial case of malaria was ascertained, which was likely due to patient‐to‐patient transmission via a contaminated blood glucose meter. Incomplete instructions for the meter seem to have played a role in this case.

Page Thumbnails