You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
The Epidemiology of Vancomycin‐Resistant Enterococcus Colonization in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
David K. Warren , MD, Marin H. Kollef , MD, Sondra M. Seiler , BA, Scott K. Fridkin , MD and Victoria J. Fraser , MD
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 24, No. 4 (April 2003), pp. 257-263
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/502199
Page Count: 7
Preview not available
OBJECTIVE. To determine the epidemiology of colonization with vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus (VRE) among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN. Ten‐month prospective cohort study. SETTING. A 19‐bed medical ICU of a 1,440‐bed teaching hospital. METHODS. Patients admitted to the ICU had rectal swab cultures for VRE on admission and weekly thereafter. VRE‐positive patients were cared for using contact precautions. Clinical data, including microbiology reports, were collected prospectively during the ICU stay. RESULTS. Of 519 patients who had admission stool cultures, 127 (25%) had cultures that were positive for VRE. Risk factors for VRE colonization identified by multiple logistic regression analysis were hospital stay greater than 3 days prior to ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 2.3 to 5.7), chronic dialysis (AOR, 2.4; CI95, 1.2 to 4.5), and having been admitted to the study hospital one to two times (AOR, 2.3; CI95, 1.4 to 3.8) or more than two times (AOR, 6.5; CI95, 3.7 to 11.6) within the past 12 months. Of the 352 VRE‐negative patients who had one or more follow‐up cultures, 74 (21%) became VRE positive during their ICU stay (27 cases per 1,000 patient‐ICU days). CONCLUSION. The prevalence of VRE culture positivity on ICU admission was high and a sizable fraction of ICU patients became VRE positive during their ICU stay despite contact precautions for VRE‐positive patients. This was likely due in large part to prior VRE exposures in the rest of the hospital where these control measures were not being used.
© 2003 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.