Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Impact of Postdischarge Surveillance on Surgical Site Infection Rates for Several Surgical Procedures: Results From the Nosocomial Surveillance Network in The Netherlands

Judith Manniën , MSc, Jan C. Wille , MSc, Ruud L. M. M. Snoeren , MSc and Susan van den Hof , PhD
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 27, No. 8 (August 2006), pp. 809-816
DOI: 10.1086/506403
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/506403
Page Count: 8
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
Impact of Postdischarge Surveillance on Surgical Site Infection Rates for Several Surgical Procedures: Results From the Nosocomial Surveillance Network in The Netherlands
Preview not available

Abstract

Objective.  To compare the number of surgical site infections (SSIs) registered after hospital discharge with respect to various surgical procedures and to identify the procedures for which postdischarge surveillance (PDS) is most important. Design.  Prospective SSI surveillance with voluntary PDS. Recommended methods for PDS in the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network are addition of a special registration card to the outpatient medical record, on which the surgeon notes clinical symptoms and whether a patient developed an SSI according to the definitions; an alternative method is examination of the outpatient medical record. Setting.  Hospitals participating in the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network between 1996 and 2004. Results.  We collected data on 131,798 surgical procedures performed in 64 of the 98 Dutch hospitals. PDS was performed according to one of the recommended methods for 31,134 operations (24%) and according to another active method for 32,589 operations (25%), and passive PDS was performed for 68,075 operations (52%). Relatively more SSIs were recorded after discharge for cases in which PDS was performed according to a recommended method (43%), compared with cases in which another active PDS method was used (30%) and cases in which passive PDS was used (25%). The highest rate of SSI after discharge was found for appendectomy (79% of operations), followed by knee prosthesis surgery (64%), mastectomy (61%), femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass (53%), and abdominal hysterectomy (53%). Conclusions.  For certain surgical procedures, most SSIs develop after discharge. SSI rates will be underestimated if no PDS is performed. We believe we have found a feasible and sensitive method for PDS that, if patients routinely return to the hospital for a postdischarge follow‐up visit, might be suitable for use internationally.

Page Thumbnails