Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Evolutionary and Ecological Causes of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in Hylid Frogs: Treefrog Trees Unearth the Roots of High Tropical Diversity

John J. Wiens, Catherine H. Graham, Daniel S. Moen, Sarah A. Smith and Tod W. Reeder
The American Naturalist
Vol. 168, No. 5 (November 2006), pp. 579-596
DOI: 10.1086/507882
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/507882
Page Count: 18
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item
Evolutionary and Ecological Causes of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in Hylid Frogs: Treefrog Trees Unearth the Roots of High Tropical Diversity
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

Abstract: Why are there more species in the tropics than in temperate regions? In recent years, this long‐standing question has been addressed primarily by seeking environmental correlates of diversity. But to understand the ultimate causes of diversity patterns, we must also examine the evolutionary and biogeographic processes that directly change species numbers (i.e., speciation, extinction, and dispersal). With this perspective, we dissect the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs. We reconstruct a phylogeny for 124 hylid species, estimate divergence times and diversification rates for major clades, reconstruct biogeographic changes, and use ecological niche modeling to identify climatic variables that potentially limit dispersal. We find that hylids originated in tropical South America and spread to temperate regions only recently (leaving limited time for speciation). There is a strong relationship between the species richness of each region and when that region was colonized but not between the latitudinal positions of clades and their rates of diversification. Temperature seasonality seemingly limits dispersal of many tropical clades into temperate regions and shows significant phylogenetic conservatism. Overall, our study illustrates how two general principles (niche conservatism and the time‐for‐speciation effect) may help explain the latitudinal diversity gradient as well as many other diversity patterns across taxa and regions.

Notes and References

This item contains 110 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of maximum likelihood. Pages 267–281 in B. N. Petrov and F. Csáki, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on information theory. Akademia Kaido, Budapest.']
  • ['Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller, and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? a simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20:255–266.']
  • ['AmphibiaWeb. 2005. AmphibiaWeb: information on amphibian biology and conservation. AmphibiaWeb, Berkeley, CA. http://amphibiaweb.org/.']
  • ['Behrensmeyer, A. K., J. D. Damuth, W. A. DiMichele, and R. Potts, eds. 1992. Terrestrial ecosystems through time: evolutionary paleoecology of terrestrial plants and animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.']
  • ['Brandley, M. C., A. Schmitz, and T. W. Reeder. 2005. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Systematic Biology 54:373–390.']
  • ['Brown, J. H., and M. V. Lomolino. 1998. Biogeography. 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Cardillo, M. 1999. Latitude and rates of diversification in birds and butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266:1221–1225.']
  • ['Cardillo, M., C. D. L. Orme, and I. P. F. Owens. 2005. Testing for latitudinal bias in diversification rates: an example using New World birds. Ecology 86:2278–2287.']
  • ['Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate paleontology and evolution. W. H. Freeman, New York.']
  • ['Cei, J. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monitore Zoológico Italiano Monografia 2:1–609.']
  • ['Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Darst, C. R., and D. C. Cannatella. 2004. Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31:462–475.']
  • ['Driskell, A. C., C. Ané, J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, B. C. O’Meara, and M. J. Sanderson. 2004. Prospects for building the Tree of Life from large sequence databases. Science 306:1172–1174.']
  • ['Duellman, W. E. 1978. The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Natural History University of Kansas 65:1–352.']
  • ['———. 2001. Hylid frogs of Middle America. 2nd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Lawrence, KS.']
  • ['———. 2005. Cusco Amazónico: the lives of amphibians and reptiles in an Amazonian rainforest. Comstock, Ithaca, NY.']
  • ['Duellman, W. E., and L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of amphibians. McGraw‐Hill, New York.']
  • ['Erixon, P., B. Svennblad, T. Britton, and B. Oxelman. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 52:665–673.']
  • ['Faivovich, J., P. C. A. Garcia, F. Ananias, L. Lanari, N. G. Basso, and W. C. Wheeler. 2004. A molecular perspective on the phylogeny of the Hyla pulchella species group. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32:938–950.']
  • ['Faivovich, J., C. F. B. Haddad, P. C. A. Garcia, D. R. Frost, J. A. Campbell, and W. C. Wheeler. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294:1–240.']
  • ['Farrell, B. D., C. Mitter, and D. J. Futuyma. 1992. Diversification at the insect‐plant interface. BioScience 42:34–42.']
  • ['Felsenstein, J. 1985a. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.']
  • ['———. 1985b. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1–15.']
  • ['Fine, P. V. A. 2001. An evaluation of the geographic area hypothesis using the latitudinal gradient in North American tree diversity. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:413–428.']
  • ['Fine, P. V. A., and R. Ree. 2006. Evidence for a time‐integrated species‐area effect on the latitudinal gradient in tree diversity. American Naturalist (forthcoming).']
  • ['Ford, L. S., and D. C. Cannatella. 1993. The major clades of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 6:94–117.']
  • ['Francis, A. P., and D. J. Currie. 2003. A globally consistent richness‐climate relationship for angiosperms. American Naturalist 161:523–536.']
  • ['———. 2004. Regional versus climatic effect on taxon richness in angiosperms: reply to Qian and Ricklefs. American Naturalist 163:780–785.']
  • ['Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160:712–726.']
  • ['Frost, D. R. 2004. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference, version 3.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html.']
  • ['Futuyma, D. J. 1998. Evolutionary biology. 3rd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18–32.']
  • ['Gaston, K. J., and T. M. Blackburn. 1996. The tropics as a museum of biological diversity: an analysis of the New World avifauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:63–68.']
  • ['Good, R. 1947. The geography of flowering plants. Longmans Green, New York.']
  • ['Gross, S. J., and T. D. Price. 2000. Determinants of the northern and southern range limits of a warbler. Journal of Biogeography 27:869–878.']
  • ['Guisan, A., T. C. Edwards, and T. Hastie. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157:89–100.']
  • ['Harrell, F. E. 2001. Regression modeling strategies: with application to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis. Springer, New York.']
  • ['Hawkins, B. A., R. Field, H. V. Cornell, D. J. Currie, J.‐F. Guégan, D. M. Kaufman, J. T. Kerr, et al. 2003. Energy, water, and broad‐scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117.']
  • ['Hawkins, B. A., J. A. F. Diniz‐Filho, and S. A. Soeller. 2006. Post‐Eocene climate change, niche conservatism, and the latitudinal diversity gradient of New World birds. Journal of Biogeography 33:770–780.']
  • ['Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. 2004. The WorldClim interpolated global terrestrial climate surfaces, version 1.3. http://biogeo.berkeley.edu/.']
  • ['———. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965–1978.']
  • ['Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42:182–192.']
  • ['Hoegg, S., M. Vences, H. Brinkmann, and A. Meyer. 2004. Phylogeny and comparative substitution rates of frogs inferred from sequences of three nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21:1188–1200.']
  • ['Holman, J. A. 1998. Pleistocene amphibians and reptiles in Britain and Europe. Oxford University Press, New York.']
  • ['———. 2003. Fossil frogs and toads of North America. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.']
  • ['Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz. 1997. How does immigration influence local adaptation? a reexamination of a familiar paradigm. American Naturalist 149:563–572.']
  • ['Huelsenbeck, J. P., and B. Rannala. 2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities. Systematic Biology 53:904–913.']
  • ['Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.']
  • ['IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global amphibian assessment. http://www.globalamphibians.org/.']
  • ['Janzen, D. H. 1967. Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. American Naturalist 101:233–249.']
  • ['Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. Evolution of a species’ range. American Naturalist 150:1–23.']
  • ['Liu, C. R., P. M. Berry, T. P. Dawson, and R. G. Pearson. 2005. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393.']
  • ['MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.']
  • ['Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2004. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 1.05. http://mesquiteproject.org.']
  • ['Magallón, S., and M. J. Sanderson. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55:1762–1780.']
  • ['Martins, E. P. 2004. COMPARE, version 4.6. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Distributed by the author at http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington.']
  • ['Moriarty, E. C., and D. C. Cannatella. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American chorus frogs (Pseudacris: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30:409–420.']
  • ['Morley, R. J. 2000. Origin and evolution of tropical rain forests. Wiley, West Sussex.']
  • ['NatureServe. 2004. InfoNatura: birds, mammals, and amphibians of Latin America, version 4.1. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. http://www.natureserve.org/infonatura.']
  • ['Nixon, K. C. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15:407–414.']
  • ['Núnez, D., R. Maneyro, J. Langone, and R. O. de Sá. 2004. Distribución geográfica de la fauna de anfibios del Uruguay. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service 134:1–36.']
  • ['Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest 2.0. Distributed by the author at http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala.']
  • ['Nylander, J. A. A., F. Ronquist, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and J. L. Nieves‐Aldrey. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53:47–67.']
  • ['Pagel, M. 1999a. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884.']
  • ['———. 1999b. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48:612–622.']
  • ['Peterson, A. T., J. Soberon, and V. Sanchez‐Cordero. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265–1267.']
  • ['Phillipe, H., E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, P. Lopez, P. W. H. Holland, and D. Casane. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21:1740–1752.']
  • ['Pianka, E. R. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. American Naturalist 100:33–46.']
  • ['Rahbek, C., and G. R. Graves. 2001. Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:4534–4539.']
  • ['R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.']
  • ['Ree, R. H., B. R. Moore, C. O. Webb, and M. J. Donoghue. 2005. A likelihood framework for inferring the evolution of geographic range on phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59:2299–2311.']
  • ['Richardson, J. E., R. T. Pennington, T. D. Pennington, and P. M. Hollingsworth. 2001. Rapid diversification of a species‐rich genus of Neotropical rain forest tree. Science 293:2242–2245.']
  • ['Ricklefs, R. E. 2004. A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecology Letters 7:1–15.']
  • ['Ricklefs, R. E., and R. E. Latham. 1992. Intercontinental correlation of geographical ranges suggests stasis in ecological traits of relict genera of temperate perennial herbs. American Naturalist 139:1305–1321.']
  • ['Ricklefs, R. E., and D. Schluter. 1993. Species diversity: regional and historical influences. Pages 350–363 in R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, eds. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.']
  • ['Ronquist, F. 1994. Ancestral areas and parsimony. Systematic Biology 43:267–274.']
  • ['———. 1996. DIVA, version 1.1. Computer program and manual available by anonymous FTP at ftp://ftp.uu.se or ftp://ftp.syst.bot.uu.se. Uppsala University, Uppsala.']
  • ['———. 1997. Dispersal‐vicariance analysis: a new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Systematic Biology 45:195–203.']
  • ['Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New York.']
  • ['Sakai, A., and W. Larcher. 1987. Frost survival of plants: responses and adaptation to freezing stress. Springer, Berlin.']
  • ['Sanchiz, F. B. 1998a. Salientia. Pages 1–276 in P. Wellnhofer, ed. Encyclopedia of paleoherpetology. Pfeil, Munich.']
  • ['———. 1998b. Vertebrates from the Early Miocene lignite deposits of the opencast mine Oberdorf (Western Styrian Basin, Austria). 2. Amphibia. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien a Mineralogie Petrologie Geologie Palaeontologie Archaeozoologie Anthropologie Praehistorie 99:13–29.']
  • ['Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:101–109.']
  • ['———. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301–302.']
  • ['Sanmartin, I., and F. Ronquist. 2004. Southern hemisphere biogeography inferred by event‐based models: plant versus animal patterns. Systematic Biology 53:216–243.']
  • ['Schluter, D., T. Price, A. O. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699–1711.']
  • ['Sikes, D. S., and P. O. Lewis. 2001. PAUPRat: PAUP implementation of the parsimony ratchet, beta version 1. Distributed by the authors. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs.']
  • ['Smith, S. A., P. R. Stephens, and J. J. Wiens. 2005. Replicate patterns of species richness, historical biogeography, and phylogeny in Holarctic treefrogs. Evolution 59:2433–2450.']
  • ['Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1994. Biometry. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.']
  • ['Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.']
  • ['Stephens, P. R., and J. J. Wiens. 2003. Explaining species richness from continents to communities: the time‐for‐speciation effect in emydid turtles. American Naturalist 161:112–128.']
  • ['Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony*, version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22:4673–4680.']
  • ['Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2003. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. Springer, New York.']
  • ['Wallace, A. R. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals. MacMillan, London.']
  • ['Wiens, J. J. 1998a. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Systematic Biology 47:568–581.']
  • ['———. 1998b. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Systematic Biology 47:625–640.']
  • ['———. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 52:528–538.']
  • ['Wiens, J. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Historical biogeography, ecology, and species richness. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:639–644.']
  • ['Wiens, J. J., and C. H. Graham. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:519–539.']
  • ['Wiens, J. J., J. W. Fetzner, C. L. Parkinson, and T. W. Reeder. 2005. Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Systematic Biology 54:719–748.']
  • ['Wilcox, T. P., D. J. Zwickl, T. A. Heath, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetic Evolution 25:361–371.']
  • ['Willig, M. R., D. M. Kaufman, and R. D. Stevens. 2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:273–309.']
  • ['Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.']
  • ['Wilson, E. O. 1992. The diversity of life. Norton, New York.']
  • ['———. 2002. The future of life. Vintage, New York.']
  • ['Wintle, B. A., J. Elith, and J. M. Potts. 2005. Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: a review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Austral Ecology 30:719–738.']
  • ['Woodward, F. I. 1987. Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.']
  • ['Zug, G. R., L. J. Vitt, and J. P. Caldwell. 2001. Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.']

Supplements