You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Antler Size Provides an Honest Signal of Male Phenotypic Quality in Roe Deer
Cécile Vanpé, Jean‐Michel Gaillard, Petter Kjellander, Atle Mysterud, Pauline Magnien, Daniel Delorme, Guy Van Laere, François Klein, Olof Liberg and A. J. Mark Hewison
The American Naturalist
Vol. 169, No. 4 (April 2007), pp. 481-493
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/512046
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Antlers, Deer, Yearlings, Population density, Population size, Age, Age structure, Forest habitats, Population growth, Animal horns
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: Identifying factors shaping secondary sexual traits is essential in understanding how their variation may influence male fitness. Little information is available on the allocation of resources to antler growth in territorial ungulates with low sexual size dimorphism. We investigated phenotypic and environmental factors affecting both absolute and relative antler size of male roe deer in three contrasting populations in France and Sweden. In the three populations, we found marked age‐specific variation in antler size, with an increase in both absolute and relative antler size between yearling and prime‐age stages, followed by a decrease (senescence) for males older than 7 years. Antler size increased allometrically with body mass. This increase was particularly strong for senescent males, suggesting the evolution of two reproductive tactics: heavy old males invested particularly heavily in antler growth (potentially remaining competitive for territories), whereas light old males grew small antlers (potentially abandoning territory defense). Finally, environmental conditions had little effect on antler size: only population density negatively affected absolute antler size in one of the three populations. Antler size may therefore provide an honest signal of male phenotypic quality in roe deer. We discuss the implications of these results in terms of territory tenure and mating competition.
© 2007 by The University of Chicago.