Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Station‐Keeping Requirements for Constellations of Free‐Flying Collectors Used for Astronomical Imaging in Space

Ronald J. Allen
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Vol. 119, No. 858 (August 2007), pp. 914-922
DOI: 10.1086/521276
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/521276
Page Count: 9
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The accuracy requirements on station‐keeping for constellations of free‐flying collectors that are coupled as (future) imaging arrays in space for astrophysics applications are examined. The basic imaging element of these arrays is the two‐element interferometer. Accurate knowledge of two quantities is required: the “projected baseline length,” which is the distance between the two interferometer elements projected on the plane transverse to the line of sight to the target, and the “optical path difference,” which is the difference in the distances from that transverse plane to the beam combiner. Rules of thumb are determined for the typical accuracy required on these parameters. The requirement on the projected baseline length is a “knowledge” requirement and depends on the angular size of the targets of interest. It is generally at a level of half a meter for typical stellar targets, decreasing to perhaps a few centimeters only for the widest attainable fields of view. The requirement on the optical path difference is a “control” requirement and is much tighter, depending on the bandwidth of the signal. It is at a level of half a wavelength for narrow (few percent) signal bands, decreasing to ≈0.2 λ for the broadest bandwidths expected to be useful. Translation of these requirements into engineering requirements on station‐keeping accuracy depends on the specific details of the collector constellation geometry. Several examples are provided to guide future application of the criteria presented here. Some implications for the design of such collector constellations and for the methods used to transform the information acquired into images are discussed.

Notes and References

This item contains 16 references.

REFERENCES
  • ['Born, M., & Wolf, E. 1975, Principles of Optics (5th ed.; Oxford: Pergamon Press)']
  • ['Cornwell, T. J. 1987, A&A, 180, 269']
  • ['ESA. 1996, Kilometric Baseline Space Interferometry (ESA Rep. SCI(96)7; Paris: ESA)']
  • ['Hecht, E. 2002, Optics (4th ed.; Reading, MA: Addison Wesley)']
  • ['Jennison, R. C. 1958, MNRAS, 118, 276']
  • ['———. 1961, Proc. Phys. Soc. 78, 596']
  • ['Jennison, R. C., & Latham, V. 1959, MNRAS, 119, 174']
  • ['Jones, D. 1991, in Technologies for Optical Interferometry in Space, ed. S. P. Synnott (JPL Pub. D‐8541; Pasadena: JPL), 177']
  • ['Lawson, P. R., ed. 2000, Principles of Long Baseline Stellar Interferometry (JPL Pub. 00‐009; Pasadena: JPL), http://olbin.jpl.nasa.gov/papers/index.html']
  • ['Monnier, J. D. 2003, Reports on Progress in Physics, 66, 789']
  • ['Quirrenbach, A. 2000, in Principles of Long Baseline Stellar Interferometry, ed. P. R. Lawson (JPL Pub. 00‐009; Pasadena: JPL), 143']
  • ['———. 2001, ARA&A, 39, 353']
  • ['Rogers, A. E.E, et al. 1974, ApJ, 193, 293']
  • ['Rogstad, D. H. 1968, Appl. Optics, 7, 585']
  • ['Shao, M., & Colavita, M. M. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 457']
  • ['Thompson, A. R. 1989, in ASP Conf. Ser. 6, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy, ed. R. A. Perley, F. R. Schwab, & A. H. Bridle (San Francisco: ASP), 11']