You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sympatric Speciation in Birds Is Rare: Insights from Range Data and Simulations
Albert B. Phillimore, C. David L. Orme, Gavin H. Thomas, Tim M. Blackburn, Peter M. Bennett, Kevin J. Gaston and Ian P. F. Owens
The American Naturalist
Vol. 171, No. 5 (May 2008), pp. 646-657
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/587074
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Speciation, Simulations, Species, Biological taxonomies, Sympatric species, Allopatric species, Data ranges, Modeling, Genetic distance, Sympatry
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: Sympatric speciation is now accepted as theoretically plausible and a likely explanation for divergence in a handful of taxa, but its contribution to large‐scale patterns of speciation remains contentious. A major problem is that it is difficult to differentiate between alternate scenarios of geographic speciation when species ranges have shifted substantially in the past. Previous studies have searched for a signal of the geographic mode of speciation by testing for a correlation between time since speciation and range overlap. Here we use simulations to show that the proportion of species showing zero or complete range overlap are more reliable indicators of the geography of speciation than is the correlation between time since speciation and overlap. We then apply these findings to the distributions of 291 pairs of avian sister species. Although 49% of pairs show some overlap in their ranges, our simulations show that this is not surprising under allopatric models of speciation. More revealingly, less than 2% show complete range overlap. Our simulations demonstrate that the observed patterns are most consistent with a model in which allopatric speciation is dominant but in which sympatric speciation is also present and contributes 5% of speciation events.
© 2008 by The University of Chicago.