You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:


Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Unifying Life‐History Analyses for Inference of Fitness and Population Growth

Ruth G. Shaw, Charles J. Geyer, Stuart Wagenius, Helen H. Hangelbroek and Julie R. Etterson
The American Naturalist
Vol. 172, No. 1 (July 2008), pp. E35-E47
DOI: 10.1086/588063
Stable URL:
Page Count: 13
Subjects: Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Biological Sciences
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Unifying Life‐History Analyses for Inference of Fitness and Population Growth
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


Abstract: The lifetime fitnesses of individuals comprising a population determine its numerical dynamics, and genetic variation in fitness results in evolutionary change. This dual importance of individual fitness is well understood, but empirical fitness records generally violate the assumptions of standard statistical approaches. This problem has undermined comprehensive study of fitness and impeded empirical synthesis of the numerical and genetic dynamics of populations. Recently developed aster models remedy this problem by explicitly modeling the dependence of later‐expressed components of fitness (e.g., fecundity) on those expressed earlier (e.g., survival to reproduce). Moreover, aster models employ different sampling distributions for different components of fitness (e.g., binomial for survival over a given interval and Poisson for fecundity). Analysis is done by maximum likelihood, and the resulting distributions for lifetime fitness closely approximate observed data. We illustrate the breadth of aster models' utility with three examples demonstrating estimation of the finite rate of increase, comparison of mean fitness among genotypic groups, and analysis of phenotypic selection. Aster models offer a unified approach to addressing the breadth of questions in evolution and ecology for which life‐history data are gathered.

Notes and References

This item contains 41 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Alvarez‐Buylla, E. R., and M. Slatkin. 1994. Finding confidence limits on population growth rates: three real examples revised. Ecology 75:255–260.']
  • ['Antonovics, J., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1984. Experimental studies of the evolutionary significance of sexual reproduction. I. A test of the frequency‐dependent selection hypothesis. Evolution 38:103–115.']
  • ['Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720–734.']
  • ['———. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709–719.']
  • ['Barndorff‐Nielsen, O. E. 1978. Information and exponential families. Wiley, Chichester.']
  • ['Belaoussoff, S., and J. S. Shore. 1995. Floral correlates and fitness consequences of mating‐system variation in Turnera ulmifolia. Evolution 49:545–556.']
  • ['Box, G. E. P., and D. R. Cox. 1964. An analysis of transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 26:211–252.']
  • ['Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Charlesworth, B. 1980. Evolution in age‐structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.']
  • ['Cheng, S., D. Wang, and E. P. Smith. 2000. Adjusting for mortality effects in chronic toxicity testing: mixture model approach. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19:204–209.']
  • ['Coulson, T., L. E. B. Kruuk, F. Tevacchia, J. M. Pemberton, and T. H. Clutton‐Brock. 2003. Estimating selection on neonatal traits in red deer using elasticity path analysis. Evolution 57:2879–2892.']
  • ['Dagne, G. A. 2004. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of correlated zero‐inflated count data. Biometrical Journal 46:653–663.']
  • ['Etterson, R. R. 2004. Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the great plains. Evolution 58:1446–1458.']
  • ['Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.']
  • ['Galloway, L. F., and J. R. Etterson. 2007. Inbreeding depression in an autotetraploid herb: a three cohort field study. New Phytologist 173:383–392.']
  • ['Geyer, C. J., S. Wagenius, and R. G. Shaw. 2007. Aster models for life history analysis. Biometrika 94:415–426.']
  • ['Howard, R. D. 1979. Estimating reproductive success in natural populations. American Naturalist 114:221–231.']
  • ['Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70.']
  • ['Janzen, F. J., and H. S. Stern. 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52:1564–1571.']
  • ['Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245–261.']
  • ['Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226.']
  • ['Lehmann, E. L., and G. Casella. 1998. Theory of point estimation. 2nd ed. Springer, New York.']
  • ['Lenski, R. E., and P. M. Service. 1982. The statistical analysis of population growth rates calculated from schedules of survivorship and fecundity. Ecology 63:655–662.']
  • ['Martin, T. G., B. A. Wintle, J. R. Rhodes, P. M. Kuhnert, S. A. Field, S. J. Low‐Choy, A. J. Tyre, and H. P. Possingham. 2005. Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations. Ecology Letters 8:1235–1246.']
  • ['McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London.']
  • ['McGraw, J. B., and H. Caswell. 1996. Estimation of individual fitness from life‐history data. American Naturalist 147:47–64.']
  • ['Mitchell‐Olds, T., and R. G. Shaw. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149–1161.']
  • ['Mood, A. M., F. A. Graybill, and D. C. Boes. 1974. Introduction to the theory of statistics. 3rd ed. McGraw‐Hill, New York.']
  • ['Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Prout, T. 1971. The relation between fitness components and population prediction in Drosophila. I. The estimation of fitness components. Genetics 68:127–149.']
  • ['R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r‐']
  • ['Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42:849–861.']
  • ['Schluter, D., and D. Nychka. 1994. Exploring fitness surfaces. American Naturalist 143:597–616.']
  • ['Shaw, R. G. 1986. Response to density in a wild population of the perennial herb Salvia lyrata: variation among families. Evolution 40:492–505.']
  • ['Shaw, R. G., C. J. Geyer, S. Wagenius, H. H. Hangelbroek, and J. R. Etterson. 2007a. More supporting data analysis for “Unifying life history analysis for inference of fitness and population growth.” Technical report 661. School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.']
  • ['———. 2007b. Supporting data analysis for “Unifying life history analysis for inference of fitness and population growth.” Technical report 658. School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.']
  • ['———. 2007c. Yet more supporting data analysis for “Unifying life history analysis for inference of fitness and population growth.” Technical report 666. School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.']
  • ['Stanton, M. L., and D. A. Thiede. 2005. Statistical convenience vs. biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytologist 166:319–337.']
  • ['van Tienderen, P. H. 2000. Elasticities and the link between demographic and evolutionary dynamics. Ecology 81:666–679.']
  • ['Wade, M. J., and S. Kalisz. 1989. The additive partitioning of selection gradients. Evolution 43:1567–1569.']
  • ['Wagenius, S. 2000. Performance of a prairie mating system in fragmented habitat: self‐incompatibility and limited pollen dispersal in Echinacea angustifolia. PhD diss. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.']