You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Proteus Rebound: Reconsidering the “Torture of Nature”
Vol. 99, No. 2 (June 2008), pp. 304-317
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/588627
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Merchants, Torture, Witchcraft, Witches, Interrogations, Nature, Experimentation, Humans, Modern philosophy, Baconian method
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
ABSTRACT Though Carolyn Merchant has agreed that Francis Bacon did not advocate the “torture of nature,” she still maintains that “the very essence of the experimental method arose out of human torture transferred onto nature.” Her arguments do not address serious problems of logic, context, and contrary evidence. Her particular insistence on the influence of the torture of witches ignores Bacon's skepticism about witchcraft as superstitious or imaginary. Nor do the writings of his successors sustain her claim that they carried forward his supposed program to abuse nature. We should be wary of metaphorical generalizations that ignore the context of the metaphor, the larger intent of the writers, and the fundamental limitations of such metaphors as descriptions of science.
© 2008 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved. 0020‐9903/2008/9902‐0003$10.00