You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Taxonomy and Why History of Science Matters for Science: A Case Study
Andrew Hamilton and Quentin D. Wheeler
Vol. 99, No. 2 (June 2008), pp. 331-340
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/588691
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Biological taxonomies, Numerical taxonomy, Systematics, DNA, Phylogenetics, Taxa, Evolution, Objectivity, Information classification, Research methods
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
ABSTRACT The history of science often has difficulty connecting with science at the lab-bench level, raising questions about the value of history of science for science. This essay offers a case study from taxonomy in which lessons learned about particular failings of numerical taxonomy (phenetics) in the second half of the twentieth century bear on the new movement toward DNA barcoding. In particular, it argues that an unwillingness to deal with messy theoretical questions in both cases leads to important problems in the theory and practice of identifying taxa. This argument makes use of scientific and historical considerations in a way that the authors hope leads to convincing conclusions about the history of taxonomy as well as about its present practice.
© 2008 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved. 0021-1753/2008/9902-0006$10.00