You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Ecosystem Engineers: Feedback and Population Dynamics
K. Cuddington, W. G. Wilson and A. Hastings
The American Naturalist
Vol. 173, No. 4 (April 2009), pp. 488-498
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/597216
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ecological engineering, Population growth, Population density, Ecosystems, Ecosystem models, Population growth rate, Population dynamics, Environmental engineering, Ecosystem dynamics, Negative feedback
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: All organisms alter their abiotic environment, but ecosystem engineers are species with abiotic effects that may have to be explicitly accounted for when making predictions about population and community dynamics. The goal of this analysis is to identify those conditions in which engineering leads to population dynamics that are qualitatively different than one would predict using models that incorporate only biotic interactions. We present a simple model coupling an ecosystem engineer and the abiotic environment. We assume that the engineer alters environmental conditions at a rate dependent on engineer density and that the environment decays back to original conditions at an exponential rate. We determine when the feedback to population dynamics through environmental state can lead to altered equilibrium densities, bistability, or runaway growth of the engineer population. The conditions leading to changes in dynamics, such as susceptibility of a system to engineering or alteration of density‐dependent and density‐independent controls, define cases in which the engineering concept is essential for ecological understanding.
© 2009 by The University of Chicago.