You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
George Sarton, His Isis, and the Aftermath
Vol. 100, No. 1 (March 2009), pp. 79-88
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/597571
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: History of science, Physics, Literary criticism, Muses, Authors, Citation indexes, History instruction, Social psychology, Names, Scholarly publishing
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
ABSTRACT It is rare that a scholarly journal reaches its hundredth volume and also maintains its intellectual rank. Some explanations for the achievements of Isis suggest themselves. Two favorable circumstances were the timing of its founding, when there had grown up a small but critical mass of contributors and readers for such a journal, and that its founder was George Sarton, a person of wide‐ranging interests, passionate scholarship, and huge ambition. His frank program was to produce, with the aid of Isis, a synthesis of the histories of all sciences, at a time when similar unifying attempts were current in other fields. In brief, episodic examinations of the early decades of Isis, this essay shows Sarton's legendary energy at work, feeding his ever‐larger project and resulting in the founding of the History of Science Society, which gave the journal its institutional base. But a look at issues over more decades reveals that the original program subsided. The journal adopted a more pluralistic guiding philosophy. Yet it must also be acknowledged that during the transition period there was a backlash against the very authority of the history of science as its early practitioners saw the field.
© 2009 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved. 0021‐1753/2009/10001‐0006$10.00