Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Significance of New Ediacaran Fossils and U‐Pb Zircon Ages from the Albemarle Group, Carolina Terrane of North Carolina

James P. Hibbard, Jeffrey C. Pollock, Matt Brennan, Scott D. Samson and Don Secor
The Journal of Geology
Vol. 117, No. 5 (September 2009), pp. 487-498
DOI: 10.1086/600863
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/600863
Page Count: 12
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($19.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available

Abstract

Abstract The Albemarle Group is one of the major defining stratigraphic units of the Carolina terrane, the best‐known division of the southern Appalachian peri‐Gondwanan block of Carolinia. As such, the group is a significant factor in the correlation of Carolinia with other peri‐Gondwanan blocks both in the Appalachians and globally. The traditionally held Ediacaran age of the group has been in question for more than a decade because of a report of Late Cambrian and younger fossils from two quarries in the group. The fossil report led to a major revision of the stratigraphy and structural reinterpretation of the Carolina terrane. Our recent studies have focused on the stratigraphy, paleontology, and geochronology of the Cid Formation in the vicinity of one of the reported Paleozoic fossil locales. Contrary to the structural reinterpretation of the Albemarle Group, Cid mudstone is shown to be in conformable and gradational contact with Flat Swamp felsic volcanics of the Cid Formation; we have obtained a precise U‐Pb zircon age of \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc} \newcommand\cyr{ \renewcommand\rmdefault{wncyr} \renewcommand\sfdefault{wncyss} \renewcommand\encodingdefault{OT2} \normalfont \selectfont} \DeclareTextFontCommand{\textcyr}{\cyr} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} \landscape $547\pm 2$ \end{document} Ma for the volcanics at a nearby locality. We also recovered the Ediacaran fossil Aspidella from the Cid mudstone. In conjunction with the new stratigraphic and geochronological data, the new fossil find leads us to consider the Cid Formation to be Ediacaran. These new data support a mainly Neoproterozoic age for the lower half of the Albemarle Group, indicating that major stratigraphic and structural revisions of the Carolina terrane based on the supposed Paleozoic fossils are unwarranted. Confirmation of the stratigraphy of the Albemarle Group has a bearing on the correlation of Carolinia with other peri‐Gondwanan crustal blocks in the Appalachian Orogen.

Page Thumbnails