You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Hand Hygiene with Soap and Water Is Superior to Alcohol Rub and Antiseptic Wipes for Removal of Clostridium difficile
Matthew T. Oughton , MD, FRCPC, Vivian G. Loo , MD, FRCPC, Nandini Dendukuri , PhD, Susan Fenn , MLT, RT and Michael D. Libman , MD, FRCPC
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 30, No. 10 (October 2009), pp. 939-944
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/605322
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Soaps, Cold water, Antiseptics, Water tables, Hands, Antibacterials, Health care industry, Surface water, Fingers, Inoculum
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Objective. To evaluate common hand hygiene methods for efficacy in removing Clostridium difficile. Design. Randomized crossover comparison among 10 volunteers with hands experimentally contaminated by nontoxigenic C. difficile. Methods. Interventions included warm water with plain soap, cold water with plain soap, warm water with antibacterial soap, antiseptic hand wipes, alcohol‐based handrub, and a control involving no intervention. All interventions were evaluated for mean reduction in colony‐forming units (CFUs) under 2 contamination protocols: “whole hand” and “palmar surface.” Results were analyzed according to a Bayesian approach, by using hierarchical models adjusted for multiple observations. Results. Under the whole‐hand protocol, the greatest adjusted mean reductions were achieved by warm water with plain soap (2.14 log10 CFU/mL [95% credible interval (CrI), 1.74–2.54 log10 CFU/mL]), cold water with plain soap (1.88 log10 CFU/mL [95% CrI, 1.48–2.28 log10 CFU/mL), and warm water with antibacterial soap (1.51 log10 CFU/mL [95% CrI, 1.12–1.91 log10 CFU/mL]), followed by antiseptic hand wipes (0.57 log10 CFU/mL [95% CrI, 0.17–0.96 log10 CFU/mL]). Alcohol‐based handrub (0.06 log10 CFU/mL [95% CrI, −0.34 to 0.45 log10 CFU/mL]) was equivalent to no intervention. Under the palmar surface protocol, warm water with plain soap, cold water with plain soap, and warm water with antibacterial soap again yielded the greatest mean reductions, followed by antiseptic hand wipes (26.6, 26.6, 26.6, and 21.9 CFUs per plate, respectively), when compared with alcohol‐based handrub. Hypothenar (odds ratio, 10.98 [95% CrI, 1.96–37.65]) and thenar (odds ratio, 6.99 [95% CrI, 1.25–23.41]) surfaces were more likely than fingertips to remain heavily contaminated after handwashing. Conclusions. Handwashing with soap and water showed the greatest efficacy in removing C. difficile and should be performed preferentially over the use of alcohol‐based handrubs when contact with C. difficile is suspected or likely.
© 2009 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.