You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Why Do Calypte Hummingbirds “Sing” with Both Their Tail and Their Syrinx? An Apparent Example of Sexual Sensory Bias
Christopher J. Clark and Teresa J. Feo
The American Naturalist
Vol. 175, No. 1 (January 2010), pp. 27-37
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/648560
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Signals, Feathers, Hummingbirds, Gender bias, Audio frequencies, Female animals, Evolution, Species, Phenotypic traits, Bird songs
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Abstract: Courtship displays frequently include complex signals that females use to pick a mate. Male Costa’s hummingbirds (Calypte costae) generate two acoustic signals during courtship: a vocal song produced close to a female and a dive‐sound produced during a courtship dive. The song and dive‐sound sound similar, and both were assumed to be produced vocally by the syrinx. Here, we show that they are not; whereas the song is produced by the syrinx, the dive‐sound is produced by high‐frequency fluttering of the outermost tail feathers. The Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna), sister to the Costa’s, also sings a vocal song and produces a dive‐sound with the wings and outermost tail feathers that sounds similar to a portion of the song. The interspecific match in signal form between the two species is not as strong as the intraspecific match. Phylogenetic reconstruction indicates that the dive‐sounds may have evolved first, suggesting that the song may have evolved to mimic the dive‐sound. We propose the “sexual sensory bias” hypothesis as an explanation for the match in form between the song and the dive‐sound within each species, in which we suggest that new sexual signals can arise in response to preexisting female preferences for older sexual signals.
© 2009 by The University of Chicago.