You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Potential Role of Active Surveillance in the Control of a Hospital‐Wide Outbreak of Carbapenem‐Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection
Debby Ben‐David , MD, Yasmin Maor , MD, Nathan Keller , MD, Gili Regev‐Yochay , MD, Ilana Tal , MS, Dalit Shachar , RN, Amir Zlotkin , PhD, Gill Smollan , MD and Galia Rahav , MD
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 31, No. 6 (June 2010), pp. 620-626
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/652528
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Patient surveillance, Infections, Hospital admissions, Carbapenems, Infection control, Disease transmission, Hospitalization, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, Intensive care units
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Background. The recent emergence of carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae is a major threat for hospitalized patients, and effective strategies are needed. Objective. To assess the effect of an intensified intervention, which included active surveillance, on the incidence of infection with carbapenem‐resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Setting. Sheba Medical Center, a 1,600‐bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Tel Hashomer, Israel. Design. Quasi‐experimental study. Methods. The medical records of all the patients who acquired a carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae infection during 2006 were reviewed. An intensified intervention was initiated in May 2007. In addition to contact precautions, active surveillance was initiated in high‐risk units. The incidence of clinical carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae infection over time was measured, and interrupted time‐series analysis was performed. Results. The incidence of clinical carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae infection increased 6.42‐fold from the first quarter of 2006 up to the initiation of the intervention. In 2006, of the 120 patients whose clinical microbiologic culture results were positive for carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae, 67 (56%) developed a nosocomial infection. During the intervention period, the rate of carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae rectal colonization was 9%. Of the 390 patients with carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae colonization or infection, 204 (52%) were identified by screening cultures. There were a total of 12,391 days of contact precautions, and of these, 4,713 (38%) were added as a result of active surveillance. After initiation of infection control measures, we observed a significant decrease in the incidence of carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae infection. Conclusions. The use of active surveillance and contact precautions, as part of a multifactorial intervention, may be an effective strategy to decrease rates of nosocomial transmission of carbapenem‐resistant K. pneumoniae colonization or infection.
© 2010 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.