You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Science Surveys and Histories of Literature: Reflections on an Uneasy Kinship
Vol. 101, No. 3 (September 2010), pp. 570-577
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/655794
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: History of science, Narratives, Literary studies, Literary history, Literary criticism, Narratology, Written narratives, American literature, Metaphors, Archival science
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
ABSTRACT With their common focus on narrative, literary scholars and historians of science share a close relationship with language and can offer each other valuable interpretive insights. Particularly revealing in each field are scientists' and literary writers' changing uses of metaphor, which is critical to each kind of scholarship since both disciplines place such a high value on cultural context. Any cross‐disciplinary help, however, needs to take into account the essential differences between the fields: contrasting views of what constitutes evidence and varying relationships with the past. Since both kinds of scholarship involve creating as well as analyzing narratives, each field has developed its own sense of pacing and significance, and their differing approaches to truth deserve respect.
© 2010 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.