You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
When Sunlight Fails to Disinfect: Understanding the Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest
Daylian M. Cain, George Loewenstein and Don A. Moore
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 37, No. 5 (February 2011), pp. 836-857
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656252
Page Count: 22
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Conflicts of interest, Estimators, Estimate reliability, Discounting, Geometric lines, Estimation bias, Conditional sales, Morality, Referral and consultation, Drug regulation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Disclosure is often proposed as a remedy for conflicts of interest, but it can backfire, hurting those whom it is intended to protect. Building on our prior research, we introduce a conceptual model of disclosure’s effects on advisors and advice recipients that helps to explain when and why it backfires. Studies 1 and 2 examine psychological mechanisms (strategic exaggeration, moral licensing) by which disclosure can lead advisors to give more-biased advice. Study 3 shows that disclosure backfires when advice recipients who receive disclosure fail to sufficiently discount and thus fail to mitigate the adverse effects of disclosure on advisor bias. Study 4 identifies one remedy for inadequate discounting of biased advice: explicitly and simultaneously contrasting biased advice with unbiased advice.
© 2010 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.