Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Floral Mimicry Enhances Pollen Export: The Evolution of Pollination by Sexual Deceit Outside of the Orchidaceae

Allan G. Ellis and Steven D. Johnson
The American Naturalist
Vol. 176, No. 5 (November 2010), pp. E143-E151
DOI: 10.1086/656487
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656487
Page Count: 9
Subjects: Biological Sciences Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
Find more content in these subjects: Biological Sciences Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

Abstract: Although the majority of flowering plants achieve pollination by exploiting the food‐seeking behavior of animals, some use alternative ploys that exploit their mate‐seeking behavior. Sexual deception is currently known only from the Orchidaceae and almost always involves pollination by male hymenoptera. An outstanding problem has been to identify the selective factors in plants that favor exploitation of mating versus feeding behaviors in pollinators. Here we show that the insectlike petal ornaments on inflorescences of the daisy Gorteria diffusa elicit copulation attempts from male bombyliid flies and that the intensity of the mating response varies across geographical floral morphotypes, suggesting a continuum in reliance on feeding through mating responses for pollination. Using pollen analogues applied to a morphotype with prominent insectlike petal ornaments, we demonstrate that mate‐seeking male flies are several‐fold more active and export significantly more pollen than females. These results suggest that selection for traits that exploit insect mating behavior can occur through the male component of plant fitness and conclusively demonstrates pollination by sexual deception in Gorteria, making this the first confirmed report of sexual deception outside of the Orchidaceae.

Notes and References

This item contains 39 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Aigner, P. A. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness trade‐offs: when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95:177–184.']
  • ['Ashman, T. L., and M. T. Morgan. 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:553–559.']
  • ['Ayasse, M., F. P. Schiestl, H. F. Paulus, F. Ibarra, and W. Francke. 2003. Pollinator attraction in a sexually deceptive orchid by means of unconventional chemicals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:517–522.']
  • ['Benitez‐Vieyra, S., A. M. Medina, and A. A. Cocucci. 2009. Variable selection patterns on the labellum shape of Geoblasta pennicillata, a sexually deceptive orchid. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:2354–2362.']
  • ['Blanco, M. A., and G. Barboza. 2005. Pseudocopulatory pollination in Lepanthes (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae) by fungus gnats. Annals of Botany 95:763–772.']
  • ['Christy, J. H. 1995. Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. American Naturalist 146:171–181.']
  • ['Cozzolino, S., and A. Widmer. 2005. Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20:487–494.']
  • ['Dafni, A. 1984. Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:259–278.']
  • ['Eisikowitch, D. 1980. The role of dark flowers in the pollination of certain Umbelliferae. Journal of Natural History 14:737–742.']
  • ['Ellis, A. G., and S. D. Johnson. 2009. The evolution of floral variation without pollinator shifts in Gorteria diffusa (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 96:793–801.']
  • ['Gaskett, A. C., and M. E. Herberstein. 2010. Colour mimicry and sexual deception by tongue orchids (Cryptostylis). Naturwissenschaften 97:97–102.']
  • ['Gaskett, A. C., C. G. Winnick, and M. E. Herberstein. 2008. Orchid sexual deceit provokes ejaculation. American Naturalist 171:E206–E212.']
  • ['Harder, L. D., and M. A. Aizen. 2010. Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365:529–543.']
  • ['Jersakova, J., and S. D. Johnson. 2006. Lack of floral nectar reduces self‐pollination in a fly‐pollinated orchid. Oecologia (Berlin) 147:60–68.']
  • ['Jersakova, J., S. D. Johnson, and P. Kindlmann. 2006. Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biological Reviews 81:219–235.']
  • ['Johnson, S. D., and A. Dafni. 1998. Response of bee‐flies to the shape and pattern of model flowers: implications for floral evolution in a Mediterranean herb. Functional Ecology 12:289–297.']
  • ['Johnson, S. D., and J. J. Midgley. 1997. Fly pollination of Gorteria diffusa (Asteraceae), and a possible mimetic function for dark spots on the capitulum. American Journal of Botany 84:429–436.']
  • ['Johnson, S. D., C. I. Peter, and J. Ågren. 2004. The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non‐rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:803–809.']
  • ['Kullenberg, B. 1961. Studies in Ophrys pollination. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala 34:1–340.']
  • ['McDonald, D. J., and J. J. A. van der Walt. 1992. Observations on the pollination of Pelargonium tricolor, section Campylia (Geraniaceae). South African Journal of Botany 58:386–392.']
  • ['Nilsson, L. A. 1983. Mimesis of bellflower (Campanula) by the red helleborine orchid Cephalanthera rubra. Nature 305:799–800.']
  • ['Paulus, H. S., and C. Gack. 1990. Pollinators as prepollinating isolation factors: evolution and speciation in Ophrys (Orchidaceae). Israel Journal of Botany 39:43–79.']
  • ['Peakall, R. 1990. Responses of male Zaspilothynnus trilobatus Turner wasps to females and the sexually deceptive orchid it pollinates. Functional Ecology 4:159–167.']
  • ['Peakall, R., and A. J. Beattie. 1996. Ecological and genetic consequences of pollination by sexual deception in the orchid Caladenia tentactulata. Evolution 50:2207–2220.']
  • ['Peakall, R., and F. P. Schiestl. 2004. A mark‐recapture study of male Colletes cunicularius bees: implications for pollination by sexual deception. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56:579–584.']
  • ['Renner, S. S. 2006. Rewardless flowers in the angiosperms and the role of insect cognition in their evolution. Pages 123–144 in N. M. Waser and J. Ollerton, eds. Plant‐pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.']
  • ['Rudall, P. J., R. M. Bateman, M. F. Fay, and A. Eastman. 2002. Floral anatomy and systematics of Alliaceae with particular reference to Gilliesia, a presumed insect mimic with strongly zygomorphic flowers. American Journal of Botany 89:1867–1883.']
  • ['Schaefer, H. M., and G. D. Ruxton. 2009. Deception in plants: mimicry or perceptual exploitation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:676–685.']
  • ['Schiestl, F. P. 2005. On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids. Naturwissenschaften 92:255–264.']
  • ['Schiestl, F. P., M. Ayasse, H. F. Paulus, C. Löfstedt, B. S. Hansson, F. Ibarra, and W. Francke. 1999. Orchid pollination by sexual swindle. Nature 399:421–422.']
  • ['Scopece, G., N. Juillet, A. Muller, F. P. Schiestl, and S. Cozzolino. 2009. Pollinator attraction in Anacamptis papilionacea (Orchidaceae): a food or a sex promise? Plant Species Biology 24:109–114.']
  • ['Scopece, G., S. Cozzolino, S. D. Johnson, and F. P. Schiestl. 2010. Pollination efficiency and the evolution of specialized deceptive pollination systems. American Naturalist 175:98–105.']
  • ['Spaethe, J., W. H. Moser, and H. F. Paulus. 2007. Increase of pollinator attraction by means of a visual signal in the sexually deceptive orchid, Ophrys heldreichii (Orchidaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 264:31–40.']
  • ['Stebbins, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. I. Pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:307–326.']
  • ['Struck, M. 1997. Floral divergence and convergence in the genus Pelargonium (Geraniaceae) in southern Africa: ecological and evolutionary considerations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208:71–97.']
  • ['Thomas, M. M., P. J. Rudall, A. G. Ellis, V. Savolainen, and B. J. Glover. 2009. Development of a complex floral trait: the pollinator‐attracting petal spots of the beetle daisy, Gorteria diffusa (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 96:2184–2196.']
  • ['Tremblay, R. L., J. D. Ackerman, J. K. Zimmerman, and R. N. Calvo. 2005. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84:1–54.']
  • ['van der Pijl, L., and C. H. Dodson. 1966. Orchid flowers: their pollination and evolution. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, FL.']
  • ['Vereecken, N. J., and F. P. Schiestl. 2009. On the roles of colour and scent in a specialized floral mimicry system. Annals of Botany 104:1077–1084.']