Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:


You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Sex Offender Registries: Fear without Function?

Amanda Y. Agan
The Journal of Law & Economics
Vol. 54, No. 1 (February 2011), pp. 207-239
DOI: 10.1086/658483
Stable URL:
Page Count: 33
Were these topics helpful?
See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


AbstractI use three separate data sets and designs to determine whether sex offender registries are effective. First, I use state-level panel data to determine whether sex offender registries and public access to them decrease the rate of rape and other sexual abuse. Second, I use a data set that contains information on the subsequent arrests of sex offenders released from prison in 1994 in 15 states to determine whether registries reduce the recidivism rate of offenders required to register compared with the recidivism of those who are not. Finally, I combine data on locations of crimes in Washington, D.C., with data on locations of registered sex offenders to determine whether knowing the locations of sex offenders in a region helps predict the locations of sexual abuse. The results from all three data sets do not support the hypothesis that sex offender registries are effective tools for increasing public safety.

Notes and References

This item contains 26 references.

  • ['Adams, Devon B. 2002. Summary of State Sex Offender Registries, 2001. Office of Justice Programs Fact Sheet No. NCJ 192265. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.']
  • ['Adkins, Geneva, David Huff, and Paul Stageberg. 2000. The Iowa Sex Offender Registry and Recidivism. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.']
  • ['Arizona Department of Corrections. 1998. Sex Offender Recidivism. Fact Sheet No. 98-06. Arizona Department of Corrections, Phoenix.']
  • ['Ayres, Ian, and John J. Donohue III. 2003. Shooting Down the “More Guns, Less Crime” Hypothesis. Stanford Law Review 55:1193–1312.']
  • ['Braithewaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.']
  • ['Helland, E., and Alexander Tabarrok. 2006. Does Three Strikes Deter? A Non-parametric Estimation. Journal of Human Resources 42:309–30.']
  • ['Klick, Jonathan, and Alexander Tabarrok. 2005. Using Terror Alert Levels to Estimate the Effect of Police on Crime. Journal of Law and Economics 48:267–79.']
  • ['Kuziemko, Ilyana, and Steven Levitt. 2004. An Empirical Analysis of Imprisoning Drug Offenders. Journal of Public Economics 88:2043–66.']
  • ['Langan, Patrick, and David Levin. 2002. Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994. Special Report No. NCJ 193247. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.']
  • ['Langan, Patrick, Erica Schmitt, and Matthew Durose. 2003. Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994. Bureau of Justice Statistics Report No. NCJ 198281. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.']
  • ['Levenson, Jill, and Leo Cotter. 2005. The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21:49–66.']
  • ['Levitt, Steven. 1998. Why Do Increased Arrest Rates Appear to Reduce Crime: Deterrence, Incapacitation or Measurement Error? Economic Inquiry 36:353–72.']
  • ['Linden, Leigh, and Jonah Rockoff. 2008. Estimates of the Impact of Crime Risk on Property Values from Megan’s Laws. American Economic Review 98:1103–27.']
  • ['Malesky, Alvin, and Jeanmarie Keim. 2001. Mental Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Sex Offender Registry Web Sites. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 13:53–63.']
  • ['Matson, Scott. 1996. Sex Offender Registration: National Requirements and State Registries. Document No. 96-12-1102. Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia.']
  • ['Murphy, Kevin, and Robert Topel. 2002. Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20:88–97.']
  • ['ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction). 2001. Bureau of Planning and Evaluation. Ten-Year Recidivism Follow-Up of 1989 Sex Offender Releases. Columbus: ODRC.']
  • ['Prentsky, Robert, Raymond Knight, and Austin Lee. 1997. Child Sexual Molestation: Research Issues. National Institute of Justice Report No. NCJ 163390. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.']
  • ['Prescott, J. J., and Jonah Rockoff. 2009. Do Sex Offender Registration Laws Affect Criminal Behavior? Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor.']
  • ['Rubin, Donald. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.']
  • ['Schram, Donna D., and Cheryl Milloy. 1995. Community Notification: A Study of Offender Characteristics and Recidivism. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.']
  • ['Tabarrok, Alexander, and Eric Helland. 1999. Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards. Journal of Law and Economics 42:157–88.']
  • ['U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Statistical Abstract of the United States Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.']
  • ['Walker, Jeffrey, Sean Madden, Bob Vazquez, Amy VanHouten, and Gwen Ervin-McLarty. 2005. The Influence of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws in the United States. Working paper. Arkansas Crime Information Center, Little Rock.']
  • ['Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. 1999. Crime and Arrests in Wisconsin—1999. Madison: Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance.']
  • ['Zevitz, Richard G., and Mary Ann Farkas. 2000. Sex Offender Community Notification: Managing High Risk Criminals or Exacting Further Vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law 18:375–91.']
Part of Sustainability