Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Honest Signaling and the Uses of Prey Coloration

Thomas J. Lee, Michael P. Speed and Philip A. Stephens
The American Naturalist
Vol. 178, No. 1 (July 2011), pp. E1-E9
DOI: 10.1086/660197
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/660197
Page Count: 9
Subjects: Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Biological Sciences
Find more content in these subjects: Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Biological Sciences
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

AbstractAlthough signal reliability is of fundamental importance to the understanding of animal communication, the extent of signal honesty in relation to antipredator warning signals has received relatively little attention. A recent theoretical model that assumed a physiological linkage between pigmentation and toxicity suggested that (aposematic) warning signals may often be reliable, in the sense that brightness and toxicity are positively correlated within prey populations. Two shortcomings of the model were (1) the requirement among predators for an innate aversion to brightly colored prey and (2) the assumption that prey can generate only bright coloration and not cryptic coloration. We evaluated the generality of predictions of reliable signaling when these shortcomings were removed. Without innate avoidance of bright prey, we found a positive brightness-toxin correlation when conspicuous prey coloration provided an additional fitness benefit unrelated to predation. Initially, this correlation could evolve for reasons unrelated to prey signaling; hence, aposematism might represent a striking example of exaptation. Given a choice between using pigmentation for bright or for cryptic coloration, crypsis was favored only in conditions of very low or very high resource levels. In the latter case, toxicity correlated positively with degree of cryptic coloration. Predictions of toxin-signal correlation appear robust, but we can identify interesting conditions in which signal reliability is not predicted.

Notes and References

This item contains 31 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Bezzerides, A. L., K. J. McGraw, R. S. Parker, and J. Husseini. 2007. Elytra color as a signal of chemical defense in the Asian ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:1401–1408.']
  • ['Blount, J. D., M. P. Speed, G. D. Ruxton, and P. A. Stephens. 2009. Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:871–877.']
  • ['Cortesi, F., and K. L. Cheney. 2010. Conspicuousness is correlated with toxicity in marine opisthobranchs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:1509–1518.']
  • ['Crothers, L., E. Gering, and M. Cummings. 2011. Aposematic signal variation predicts male-male interactions in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 65:599–605.']
  • ['Darst, C., M. Cummings, and D. Cannatella. 2006. A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103:5852.']
  • ['Endler, J. A. 1993. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 340:215–225.']
  • ['Franks, D., G. D. Ruxton, and T. N. Sherratt. 2009. Warning signals evolve to disengage Batesian mimics. Evolution 63:256–267.']
  • ['Friman, V., C. Lindstedt, T. Hiltunen, J. Laakso, and J. Mappes. 2009. Predation on multiple trophic levels shapes the evolution of pathogen virulence. PloS ONE 4:835–842.']
  • ['Gould, S., and E. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15.']
  • ['Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical biology 144:517–546.']
  • ['Guilford, T. 1988. The evolution of conspicuous coloration. American Naturalist 131:7–21.']
  • ['———. 1994. “Go-slow” signalling and the problem of automimicry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 170:311–316.']
  • ['Leimar, O., M. Enquist, and B. Sillén-Tullberg. 1986. Evolutionary stability of aposematic coloration and prey unprofitability: a theoretical analysis. American Naturalist 128:469–490.']
  • ['Lewis, S., and C. Cratsley. 2008. Flash signal evolution, mate choice, and predation in fireflies. Annual Review of Entomology 53:293–321.']
  • ['Lindstedt, C., L. Lindstrom, and J. Mappes. 2008. Thermoregulation constrains effective warning signal expression. Evolution 63:469–478.']
  • ['Maan, M., and M. Cummings. 2008. Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 62:2334–2345.']
  • ['———. 2009. Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:19072–19077.']
  • ['Mappes, J., N. Marples, and J. Endler. 2005. The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20:598–603.']
  • ['Marples, N., D. Kelly, and R. Thomas. 2005. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Evolution 59:933–940.']
  • ['Ruxton, G. D., T. N. Sherratt, and M. P. Speed. 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.']
  • ['Ruxton, G. D., M. Speed, and M. Broom. 2007. The importance of initial protection of conspicuous mutants for the coevolution of defense and aposematic signaling of the defense: a modeling study. Evolution 61:2165–2174.']
  • ['———. 2009. Identifying the ecological conditions that select for intermediate levels of aposematic signalling. Evolutionary Ecology 23:491–501.']
  • ['Sherratt, T. N. 2002. The coevolution of warning signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:741–746.']
  • ['Speed, M. P., and G. D. Ruxton. 2005. Warning displays in spiny animals: one (more) evolutionary route to aposematism. Evolution 59:2499–2508.']
  • ['———. 2007. How bright and how nasty: explaining diversity in warning signal strength. Evolution 61:623–635.']
  • ['Speed, M. P., G. D. Ruxton, J. D. Blount, and P. A. Stephens. 2010. Diversification of honest signalling in a predator-prey system. Ecology Letters 13:744–753.']
  • ['Summers, K., and M. E. Clough. 2001. The evolution of coloration and toxicity in the poison frog family (Dendrobatidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:6227–6232.']
  • ['Tazzyman, S. J., and Y. Iwasa. 2010. Sexual selection can increase the effect of random genetic drift: a quantitative genetic model of polymorphism in Oophaga pumilio, the strawberry poison-dart frog. Evolution 64:1719–1728.']
  • ['Tullberg, B., S. Merilaita, and C. Wiklund. 2005. Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272:1315.']
  • ['Williams, P. 2007. The distribution of bumblebee colour patterns worldwide: possible significance for thermoregulation, crypsis, and warning mimicry. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92:97–118.']
  • ['Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection: selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53:205–214.']