Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:


You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Female, but Not Male, Tropical Sparrows Respond More Strongly to the Local Song Dialect: Implications for Population Divergence

Julie E. Danner, Raymond M. Danner, Frances Bonier, Paul R. Martin, Thomas W. Small and Ignacio T. Moore
The American Naturalist
Vol. 178, No. 1 (July 2011), pp. 53-63
DOI: 10.1086/660283
Stable URL:
Page Count: 11
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


AbstractIn addition to the observed high diversity of species in the tropics, divergence among populations of the same species exists over short geographic distances in both phenotypic traits and neutral genetic markers. Divergence among populations suggests great potential for the evolution of reproductive isolation and eventual speciation. In birds, song can evolve quickly through cultural transmission and result in regional dialects, which can be a critical component of reproductive isolation through variation in female preference. We examined female and male behavioral responses to local and nonlocal dialects in two allopatric populations of rufous-collared sparrows (Zonotrichia capensis) in the Andes Mountains of Ecuador. Here we show that female sparrows prefer their natal song dialect to the dialect of an allopatric population that is just 25 km away and separated by an unsuitable higher-elevation habitat (pass of 4,200 m), thus providing evidence of prezygotic reproductive isolation among populations. Males showed similar territorial responses to all conspecific dialects with no consistent difference with respect to distance, making male territoriality uninformative for estimating reproductive isolation. This study provides novel evidence for culturally based prezygotic isolation over very short distances in a tropical bird.

Notes and References

This item contains 85 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Aleixo, A. 2004. Historical diversification of a terra-firme forest bird superspecies: a phylogeographic perspective on the role of different hypotheses of Amazonian diversification. Evolution 58:1303–1317.']
  • ['Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.']
  • ['Baker, M. C. 1982. Genetic population structure and vocal dialects in Zonotrichia (Emberizidae). Pages 209–235 in D. H. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. 2. Song learning and its consequences. Academic Press, New York.']
  • ['Baker, M. C., and J. T. Boylan. 1999. Singing behavior, mating associations and reproductive success in a population of hybridizing lazuli and indigo buntings. Condor 101:493–504.']
  • ['Baker, M. C., K. J. Spitler-Nabors, and D. C. Bradley. 1981. Early experience determines song dialect responsiveness of female sparrows. Science 214:819–821.']
  • ['———. 1982. The response of female mountain white-crowned sparrows to song from their natal dialect and an alien dialect. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10:175–179.']
  • ['Bates, J. M., S. J. Hackett, and J. M. Goerck. 1999. High levels of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in two lineages of antbirds (Drymophila and Hypocnemis). Auk 116:1093–1106.']
  • ['Bell, D. A., P. W. Trail, and L. F. Baptista. 1998. Song learning and vocal tradition in Nuttall’s white-crowned sparrows. Animal Behaviour 55:939–956.']
  • ['Boul, K. E., W. C. Funk, C. R. Darst, D. C. Cannatella, and M. J. Ryan. 2007. Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:399–406.']
  • ['Brumfield, R. T., and A. P. Capparella. 1996. Historical diversification of birds in northwestern South America: a molecular perspective on the role of vicariant events. Evolution 50:1607–1624.']
  • ['Charif, R., C. Clark, and K. Fristrup. 2004. Raven 1.2.1. Cornell Lab of Ornithology Bioacoustics Research Program, Ithaca, NY.']
  • ['Chek, A. A., J. D. Austin, and S. C. Lougheed. 2003. Why is there a tropical-temperate disparity in the genetic diversity and taxonomy of species? Evolution Ecology Research 5:69–77.']
  • ['Chilton, G., and M. R. Lein. 1996. Songs and sexual responses of female white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) from a mixed-dialect population. Behaviour 133:173–198.']
  • ['Clayton, N. S. 1990. Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 330:351–370.']
  • ['Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.']
  • ['Derryberry, E. P. 2007. Evolution of bird song affects signal efficacy: an experimental test using historical and current signals. Evolution 61:1938–1945.']
  • ['Eo, S. H., J. P. Wares, and J. P. Carroll. 2008. Population divergence in plant species reflects latitudinal biodiversity gradients. Biology Letters 4:382–384.']
  • ['Fitzsimmons, L. P., N. K. Barker, and D. J. Mennill. 2008. Individual variation and lek-based vocal distinctiveness in songs of the screaming piha (Lipaugus vociferans), a suboscine songbird. Auk 125:908–914.']
  • ['Fouquet, A., M. Vences, M. D. Salducci, A. Meyer, C. Marty, M. Blanc, and A. Gilles. 2007. Revealing cryptic diversity using molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography in frogs of the Scinax ruber and Rhinella margaritifera species groups. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43:567–582.']
  • ['Funk, W. C., D. C. Cannatella, and M. J. Ryan. 2009. Genetic divergence is more tightly related to call variation than landscape features in the Amazonian frogs Physalaemus pertersi and P. freibergi. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:1839–1853.']
  • ['Grant, B. R., and P. R. Grant. 2002. Simulating secondary contact in allopatric speciation: an empirical test of premating isolation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76:545–556.']
  • ['Hackett, S. J., and K. V. Rosenberg. 1990. Comparison of phenotypic and genetic differentiation in South American antwrens (Formicariidae). Auk 107:473–489.']
  • ['Handford, P., and F. F. Nottebohm. 1976. Allozymic and morphological variation in population samples of rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, in relation to vocal dialects. Evolution 30:802–817.']
  • ['Helbig, A. J., A. G. Knox, D. T. Parkin, G. Sangster, and M. Collinson. 2002. Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144:518–525.']
  • ['Hoskin, C. J., M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353–1356.']
  • ['Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50:346–363.']
  • ['Hudson, R. R., and J. A. Coyne. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56:1557–1565.']
  • ['Irwin, D. E., S. Bensch, and T. D. Price. 2001. Speciation in a ring. Nature 409:333–337.']
  • ['Irwin, D. E., S. Bensch, J. H. Irwin, and T. D. Price. 2005. Speciation by distance in a ring species. Science 307:414–416.']
  • ['Jackman, S. 2010. pscl: classes and methods for R developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory, Stanford University. Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. R package version 1.03.6.']
  • ['Kay, K. M., and D. W. Schemske. 2008. Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of Neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution 62:2628–2642.']
  • ['Kirschel, A. N. G., D. T. Blumstein, and T. B. Smith. 2009. Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:8256–8261.']
  • ['Koscinski, D., P. Handford, P. L. Tubaro, S. Sharp, and S. C. Lougheed. 2008. Pleistocene climatic cycling and diversification of the Andean treefrog, Hypsiboas andinus. Molecular Ecology 17:2012–2025.']
  • ['Kroodsma, D. E. 1989. Suggested experimental design for song playbacks. Animal Behaviour 37:600–609.']
  • ['———. 1996. Ecology of passerine song development. Pages 3–19 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.']
  • ['Lougheed, S. C., and P. Handford. 1992. Vocal dialects and the structure of geographic variation in morphological and allozymic characters in the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis. Evolution 46:1443–1456.']
  • ['Lougheed, S. C., A. J. Lougheed, M. Rae, and P. Handford. 1989. Analysis of dialect boundary in chaco vegetation in the rufous-collared sparrow. Condor 91:1002–1005.']
  • ['Lougheed, S. C., P. Handford, and A. J. Baker. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA hyperdiversity and vocal dialects in a subspecies transition of the rufous-collared sparrow. Condor 95:889–895.']
  • ['Lynch, A. 1996. The population memetics of birdsong. Pages 181–197 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.']
  • ['MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A., and S. A. MacDougall-Shackleton. 2001. Cultural and genetic evolution in mountain white-crowned sparrows: song dialects are associated with population structure. Evolution 55:2568–2575.']
  • ['MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., E. A. MacDougall-Shackleton, and T. P. Hahn. 2001. Physiological and behavioural responses of female mountain white-crowned sparrows to natal- and foreign-dialect songs. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:325–333.']
  • ['MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A., E. P. Derryberry, and T. P. Hahn. 2002. Nonlocal male mountain white-crowned sparrows have lower paternity and higher parasite loads than males singing local dialect. Behavioral Ecology 13:682–689.']
  • ['Marler, P., and S. Peters. 1977. Selective vocal learning in a sparrow. Science 198:519–521.']
  • ['Marler, P., and M. Tamura. 1964. Culturally transmitted patterns of vocal behavior in sparrows. Science 146:1483–1486.']
  • ['Martens, J. 1996. Vocalizations and speciation of Palearctic birds. Pages 221–240 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.']
  • ['Martin, P. R., and J. K. McKay. 2004. Latitudinal variation in genetic divergence of populations and the potential for future speciation. Evolution 58:938–945.']
  • ['Martin, P. R., and J. J. Tewksbury. 2008. Latitudinal variation in subspecific diversification of birds. Evolution 62:2775–2788.']
  • ['Mayr, E., and D. A. Ashlock. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.']
  • ['Mittelbach, G. G., D. W. Schemske, H. V. Cornell, A. P. Allen, J. M. Brown, M. B. Bush, S. P. Harrison, et al. 2007. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology Letters 10:315–331.']
  • ['Moore, M. C. 1982. Hormonal response of free-living male white-crowned sparrows to experimental manipulation of female sexual behavior. Hormones and Behavior 16:323–329.']
  • ['Moore, I. T., N. Perfito, H. Wada, T. S. Sperry, and J. C. Wingfield. 2002. Latitudinal variation in plasma testosterone levels in birds of the genus Zonotrichia. General and Comparative Endocrinology 129:13–19.']
  • ['Moore, I. T., F. Bonier, and J. C. Wingfield. 2005. Reproductive asynchrony and population divergence between two tropical bird populations. Behavioral Ecology 16:755–762.']
  • ['Nelson, D. A., and J. A. Soha. 2004. Male and female white-crowned sparrows respond differently to geographic variation in song. Behaviour 141:53–69.']
  • ['Nelson, D. A., C. Whaling, and P. Marler. 1996. The capacity for song memorization varies in populations of the same species. Animal Behaviour 52:379–387.']
  • ['Nelson, D. A., H. Khanna, and P. Marler. 2001. Learning by instruction or selection: implications for patterns of geographic variation in bird song. Behaviour 138:1137–1160.']
  • ['Nottebohm, F. 1969. The song of the chingolo, Zonotrichia capensis, in Argentina: description and evaluation of a system of dialects. Condor 71:299–315.']
  • ['———. 1975. Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: some possible ecological correlates. American Naturalist 109:605–624.']
  • ['Nowicki, S., and W. A. Searcy. 2002. Song function and the evolution of female preferences: why birds sing, why brains matter. Pages 704–723 in H. P. Zeigler and P. Marler, eds. Behavioral neurobiology of birdsong. New York Academy of Sciences, New York.']
  • ['Nyari, A. S. 2007. Phylogeographic patterns, molecular and vocal differentiation, and species limits in Schiffornis turdina (Aves). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44:154–164.']
  • ['O’Loghlen, A. L., and M. D. Beecher. 1997. Sexual preferences for mate song types in female song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 53:835–841.']
  • ['Patten, M. A., J. T. Rotenberry, and M. Zuk. 2004. Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58:2144–2155.']
  • ['Podos, J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature 409:185–188.']
  • ['———. 2007. Discrimination of geographical song variants by Darwin’s finches. Animal Behaviour 73:833–844.']
  • ['Podos, J., and P. S. Warren. 2007. Advances in the study of behavior. Elsevier, San Diego, CA.']
  • ['Price, T. D. 2008. Speciation in birds. Roberts, Greenwood Village, CO.']
  • ['Price, T. D., and M. M. Bouvier. 2002. The evolution of F-1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083–2089.']
  • ['Ratcliffe, L. M., and P. R. Grant. 1985. Species recognition in Darwin’s finches: male responses to playback of different song types, dialects and heterospecific songs. Animal Behaviour 33:290–307.']
  • ['Ratcliffe, L. M., and K. Otter. 1996. Sex differences in song recognition. Pages 339–355 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.']
  • ['R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna.']
  • ['Ryan, M. J., W. Rand, P. L. Hurd, S. M. Phelps, and A. S. Rand. 2003. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. American Naturalist 161:380–394.']
  • ['Sæther, S. A., G. P. Sætre, T. Borge, C. Wiley, N. Svedin, G. Andersson, T. Veen, et al. 2007. Sex chromosome–linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318:95–97.']
  • ['Schemske, D. W. 2009. Biotic interactions and speciation in the tropics. Pages 219–239 in R. Butlin, J. Bridle, and D. Schluter, eds. Speciation and patterns of diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.']
  • ['Searcy, W. A. 1992. Measuring responses of female birds to male songs. Pages 175–189 in P. K. McGregor, ed. Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York.']
  • ['Searcy, W. A., and E. A. Brenowitz. 1988. Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 332:152–154.']
  • ['Searcy, W. A., S. Nowicki, M. Hughes, and S. Peters. 2002. Geographic song discrimination in relation to dispersal distances in song sparrows. American Naturalist 159:221–230.']
  • ['Seddon, N., and J. A. Tobias. 2007. Song divergence at the edge of Amazonia: an empirical test of the peripatric speciation model. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90:173–188.']
  • ['———. 2010. Character displacement from the receiver’s perspective: species and mate recognition despite convergent signals in suboscine birds. Proceeding of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277:2475–2483.']
  • ['Slabbekoorn, H., and T. B. Smith. 2002. Bird song, ecology, and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 357:493–503.']
  • ['Tobias, J. A., and N. Seddon. 2009. Signal design and perception in Hypocnemis antbirds: evidence for convergent evolution via social selection. Evolution 63:3168–3189.']
  • ['Uy, J. A. C., R. G. Moyle, C. E. Filardi, and D. Presgraves. 2009. Plumage and song differences mediate species recognition between incipient flycatcher species of the Solomon Islands. Evolution 63:153–164.']
  • ['Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. Springer, New York.']
  • ['Vuong, Q. H. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57:307–333.']
  • ['Weisman, R., S. Shackleton, L. M. Ratcliffe, D. Weary, and P. Boag. 1994. Sexual preferences of female zebra finches: imprinting on beak color. Behaviour 128:15–24.']
  • ['Zeileis, A., and T. Hothorn. 2002. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2:7–10.']
  • ['Zeileis, A., C. Kleiber, and S. Jackman. 2008. Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27:1–25.']