You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Pitfalls of Microphysical Realism
Muhammad Ali Khalidi
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 78, No. 5 (December 2011), pp. 1156-1164
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/662285
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Causation, Real property, Elementary particles, Quarks, Natural kinds, Natural law, Protons, Kitchen tables, Property law, Quantum mechanics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Microphysical realism is the position that the only real entities and properties are found at the most fundamental level of nature. In this article, I challenge microphysical realism concerning properties and natural kinds. One argument for microphysical realism about entities, the “nothing-but argument,” does not apply to properties and kinds. Another argument, the “causal exclusion argument,” cannot be sustained in light of modern physics. Moreover, this argument leads to an objection against microphysical realism, based on the “illusoriness of macroproperties.” Another objection is based on the possibility that there is no fundamental level but a “bottomless pit.”
Copyright 2011 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.