Your PDF has successfully downloaded.
You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Desert and Avoidability in Self-Defense
John Gardner and François Tanguay-Renaud
Vol. 122, No. 1, Symposium on Jeff McMahan’s Killing in War (October 2011), pp. 111-134
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/662294
Page Count: 24
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Self defense, Killing, Right of self defense, Morality, Distributive justice, Pure reason, Guilt, Legal objections, Puzzles, Side effects
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Jeff McMahan rejects the relevance of desert to the morality of self-defense. In Killing in War he restates his rejection and adds to his reasons. We argue that the reasons are not decisive and that the rejection calls for further attention, which we provide. Although we end up agreeing with McMahan that the limits of morally acceptable self-defense are not determined by anyone’s deserts, we try to show that deserts may have some subsidiary roles in the morality of self-defense. We suggest that recognizing this might help McMahan to answer some unanswered questions to which his own position gives rise.
© 2011 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.