Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:

Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Duty, Obedience, Desert, and Proportionality in War: A Response

Jeff McMahan
Ethics
Vol. 122, No. 1, Symposium on Jeff McMahan’s Killing in War (October 2011), pp. 135-167
DOI: 10.1086/662631
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/662631
Page Count: 33
Were these topics helpful?
See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

This essay responds to four commentaries on my recently published book, Killing in War. It defends the view that soldiers ought to disobey an order to fight in a war that lacks a just cause, argues against the contractarian approach to the morality of war, develops an explanation of how the number of people who are harmed by defensive action can affect whether that action is proportionate in the “narrow” sense, and seeks to rebut the suggestion that an attacker’s desert may be relevant to the justification for harming him in self-defense.