You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Bracing for the Psychological Storm: Proactive versus Reactive Compensatory Consumption
Soo Kim and Derek D. Rucker
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 39, No. 4 (December 2012), pp. 815-830
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/665832
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Music, Consumer psychology, Consumer behavior, Tea, Musical aesthetics, Pretests, Consumer motivation, Consumer research, Music preferences, Musical modes
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This research introduces the distinction between compensatory consumption that is engaged in after, as opposed to before, one experiences a self-threat (termed reactive vs. proactive compensatory consumption). Five experiments document the phenomenon of proactive compensatory consumption as well as corresponding boundary conditions for its effect. Furthermore, whereas both reactive and proactive compensatory consumption are associated with seeking products that symbolically relate to an experienced or potential threat, we demonstrate that reactive compensatory consumption is more likely to be associated with the use of products for the purpose of distraction. We examine how and when these different forms of compensatory consumption affect consumers’ preferences versus actual consumption behavior. Implications for delineating reactive versus proactive compensatory consumption in the literature, as well as the use of consumption for the purpose of symbolic self-completion versus distraction, are discussed.
© 2012 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.