Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

A Conceptual and Statistical Framework for Adaptive Radiations with a Key Role for Diversity Dependence

Rampal S. Etienne and Bart Haegeman
The American Naturalist
Vol. 180, No. 4 (October 2012), pp. E75-E89
DOI: 10.1086/667574
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667574
Page Count: 15
Subjects: Biological Sciences Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
A Conceptual and Statistical Framework for Adaptive Radiations with a Key Role for Diversity Dependence
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Abstract

AbstractIn this article we propose a new framework for studying adaptive radiations in the context of diversity-dependent diversification. Diversity dependence causes diversification to decelerate at the end of an adaptive radiation but also plays a key role in the initial pulse of diversification. In particular, key innovations (which in our definition include novel traits as well as new environments) may cause decoupling of the diversity-dependent dynamics of the innovative clade from the diversity-dependent dynamics of its ancestral clade. We present a likelihood-based inference method to test for decoupling of diversity dependence using molecular phylogenies. The method, which can handle incomplete phylogenies, identifies when the decoupling took place and which diversification parameters are affected. We illustrate our approach by applying it to the molecular phylogeny of the North American clade of the legume tribe Psoraleeae (47 extant species, of which 4 are missing). Two diversification rate shifts were previously identified for this clade; our analysis shows that the first, positive shift can be associated with decoupling of two Pediomelum subgenera from the other Psoraleeae lineages, while we argue that the second, negative shift can be attributed to speciation being protracted. The latter explanation yields nonzero extinction rates, in contrast to previous findings. Our framework offers a new perspective on macroevolution: new environments and novel traits (ecological opportunity) and diversity dependence (ecological limits) cannot be considered separately.

Notes and References

This item contains 70 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Albertson, R. C., J. A. Markert, P. D. Danley, and T. D. Kocher. 1999. Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, east Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:5107–5110.']
  • ['Alfaro, M., F. Santini, C. Brock, H. Alamillo, A. Dornburg, D. Rabosky, G. Carnevale, and L. Harmon. 2009. Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:13410–13414.']
  • ['Alroy, J. 1996. Constant extinction, constrained diversification and uncoordinated stasis in North American mammals. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 127:285–311.']
  • ['Bailey, N. 1964. The elements of stochastic processes with applications to the natural sciences. Wiley Publications in Statistics. Wiley, New York.']
  • ['Bapst, D. W., P. C. Bullock, M. J. Melchin, H. D. Sheets, and C. E. Mitchell. 2012. Graptoloid diversity and disparity became decoupled during the Ordovician mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109:3428–3433.']
  • ['Barraclough, T. G., and S. Nee. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:391–399.']
  • ['Bottke, W. F., D. Vokrouhlický, and D. Nesvorný. 2007. An asteroid breakup 160 myr ago as the probable source of the K/T impactor. Nature 449:48–53.']
  • ['Burbrink, F., and R. Pyron. 2009. How does ecological opportunity influence rates of speciation, extinction, and morphological diversification in New World ratsnakes (tribe Lampropeltini)? Evolution 64:934–943.']
  • ['Chan, K. M. A., and B. R. Moore. 2002. Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates. Systematic Biology 51:855–865.']
  • ['De Queiroz, A. 1998. Interpreting sister-group tests of key innovation hypotheses. Systematic Biology 47:710–718.']
  • ['———. 2002. Contingent predictability in evolution: key traits and diversification. Systematic Biology 51:917–929.']
  • ['Egan, A. N., and K. A. Crandall. 2008a. Divergence and diversification in North American Psoraleeae (Fabaceae) due to climate change. BMC Biology 6:55.']
  • ['———. 2008b. Data from: Divergence and diversification in North American Psoraleeae (Fabaceae) due to climate change. BMC Biology 6:55. Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.sr927n43.']
  • ['Etienne, R. S., B. Haegeman, T. Stadler, T. Aze, P. N. Pearson, A. Purvis, and A. B. Phillimore. 2012. Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279:1300–1309.']
  • ['Etienne, R. S., and J. Rosindell. 2012. Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification. Systematic Biology 61:204–213.']
  • ['Ezard, T. H. G., T. Aze, P. N. Pearson, and A. Purvis. 2011. Interplay between changing climate and species’ ecology drives macroevolutionary dynamics. Science 332:349–351.']
  • ['Farris, J. S. 1976. Expected asymmetry of phylogenetic trees. Systematic Zoology 25:196–198.']
  • ['Gavrilets, S., and J. B. Losos. 2009. Adaptive radiation: contrasting theory with data. Science 323:732–737.']
  • ['Glor, R. E. 2010. Phylogenetic insights on adaptive radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 41:251–270.']
  • ['Goudet, J. 1999. An improved procedure for testing the effects of key innovations on rate of speciation. American Naturalist 153:549–555.']
  • ['Haig, D., and M. Westoby. 1991. Seed size, pollination costs and angiosperm success. Evolutionary Ecology 5:231–247.']
  • ['Heard, S. B., and D. L. Hauser. 1995. Key evolutionary innovations and their ecological mechanisms. Historical Biology 10:151–173.']
  • ['Hodges, S. A., and M. L. Arnold. 1995. Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 262:343–348.']
  • ['Hunter, J. P. 1998. Key innovations and the ecology of macroevolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:31–36.']
  • ['Kendall, D. G. 1948. On the generalized “birth-and-death” process. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19:1–15.']
  • ['Kirkpatrick, M., and M. Slatkin. 1993. Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 47:1171–1181.']
  • ['Lack, D. 1947. Darwin’s finches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.']
  • ['Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press, Berkeley.']
  • ['———. 2010. Adaptive radiation, ecological opportunity, and evolutionary determinism. American Naturalist 175:623–639.']
  • ['Lovette, I. J., and E. Bermingham. 1999. Explosive speciation in the New World Dendroica warblers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266:1629–1636.']
  • ['Maddison, W. P., P. E. Midford, and S. P. Otto. 2007. Estimating a binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. Systematic Biology 56:701–710.']
  • ['Mahler, D. L., L. J. Revell, R. E. Glor, and J. B. Losos. 2010. Ecological opportunity and the rate of morphological evolution in the diversification of greater Antillean anoles. Evolution 64:2731–2745.']
  • ['Matschiner, M., R. Hanel, and W. Salzburger. 2011. On the origin and trigger of the notothenioid adaptive radiation. PLoS ONE 6:e18911.']
  • ['McConway, K. J., and H. J. Sims. 2004. A likelihood-based method for testing for non-stochastic variation of diversification rates in phylogenies. Evolution 58:12–23.']
  • ['McInnes, L., C. D. L. Orme, and A. Purvis. 2011. Detecting shifts in diversity limits from molecular phylogenies: what can we know? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0241.']
  • ['McPeek, M. A. 2008. The ecological dynamics of clade diversification and community assembly. American Naturalist 172:E270–E284.']
  • ['Mooers, A. O., and S. B. Heard. 1997. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Quarterly Review of Biology 72:31–54.']
  • ['Nee, S. 2006. Birth-death models in macroevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 37:1–17.']
  • ['Nee, S., R. M. May, and P. H. Harvey. 1994. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 344:305–311.']
  • ['Paradis, E. 1997. Assessing temporal variations in diversification rates from phylogenies: estimation and hypothesis testing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 264:1141–1147.']
  • ['Phillimore, A. B., and T. D. Price. 2008. Density-dependent cladogenesis in birds. PLoS Biology 6:e71.']
  • ['Quental, T. B., and C. R. Marshall. 2009. Extinction during evolutionary radiations: reconciling the fossil record with molecular phylogenies. Evolution 63:3158–3167.']
  • ['Rabosky, D. L. 2006. Likelihood methods for detecting temporal shifts in diversification rates. Evolution 60:1152–1164.']
  • ['———. 2009. Ecological limits and diversification rate: alternative paradigms to explain the variation in species richness among clades and regions. Ecology Letters 12:735–743.']
  • ['Rabosky, D. L., and I. J. Lovette. 2008a. Density-dependent diversification in North American wood warblers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:2363–2371.']
  • ['———. 2008b. Explosive evolutionary radiations: increasing extinction or decreasing speciation through time. Evolution 62:1866–1875.']
  • ['Ree, H. 2005. Detecting the historical signature of key innovations using stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis. Evolution 59:257–265.']
  • ['Ricklefs, R. E. 2007. Estimating diversification rates from phylogenetic information. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:601–610.']
  • ['Rosenzweig, M. 1996. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.']
  • ['Rosindell, J., S. J. Cornell, S. P. Hubbell, and R. S. Etienne. 2010. Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 13:716–727.']
  • ['Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1996. Reconstructing shifts in diversification rates on phylogenetic trees. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:15–20.']
  • ['Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, New York.']
  • ['Sepkoski, J. J. 1978. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. I. Analysis of marine orders. Paleobiology 4:223–251.']
  • ['———. 1979. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology 5:222–251.']
  • ['———. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.']
  • ['Shao, K.-T., and R. Sokal. 1990. Tree balance. Systematic Zoology 39:266–276.']
  • ['Simpson, G. G. 1949. Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.']
  • ['———. 1953. The major features of evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.']
  • ['Slowinski, J. B., and C. Guyer. 1989a. Testing null models in questions of evolutionary success. Systematic Zoology 38:189–191.']
  • ['———. 1989b. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. American Naturalist 134:907–921.']
  • ['———. 1993. Testing whether certain traits have caused amplified diversification: an improved method based on a model of random speciation and extinction. American Naturalist 142:1019–1024.']
  • ['Sookias, R., R. Butlin, and R. Benson. 2012. Rise of dinosaurs reveals major body-size transitions are driven by passive processes of trait evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2441.']
  • ['Steeman, M. E., M. B. Hebsgaard, R. E. Fordyce, S. Y. W. Ho, D. L. Rabosky, R. Nielsen, C. Rahbek, H. Glenner, M. V. Sørensen, and E. Willerslev. 2009. Radiation of extant cetaceans driven by restructuring of the oceans. Systematic Biology 58:573–585.']
  • ['Valentine, J. W. 1973. Evolutionary paleoecology of the marine biosphere. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.']
  • ['———. 1980. Determinants of diversity in higher taxonomic categories. Paleobiology 6:444–450.']
  • ['Vincent, T. L., and J. S. Brown. 2005. Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and Darwinian dynamics. Cambridge University Press, New York.']
  • ['Vrba, E. S. 1980. Evolution, species and fossils: how does life evolve? South African Journal of Science 76:61–84.']
  • ['Walker, T. D., and J. W. Valentine. 1984. Equilibrium models of evolutionary species diversity and the number of empty niches. American Naturalist 124:887–899.']
  • ['Wiens, J. J. 2011. The causes of species richness patterns across space, time, and clades and the role of ecological limits. Quarterly Review of Biology 86:75–96.']
  • ['Yoder, J. B., E. Clancey, S. Des Roches, J. M. Eastman, L. Gentry, W. Godsoe, T. J. Hagey, et al. 2010. Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:1581–1596.']

Supplements