Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:


You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Marked Shifts in Offspring Size Elicited by Frequent Fusion among Siblings in an Internally Brooding Marine Invertebrate

Zhao Sun, Jean-François Hamel and Annie Mercier
The American Naturalist
Vol. 180, No. 5 (November 2012), pp. E151-E160
DOI: 10.1086/667862
Stable URL:
Page Count: 10

You can always find the topics here!

Topics: Larvae, Lipids, Larval development, Embryos, Juvenile stages, Siblings, Species, Female animals, Chimeras, Oocytes
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


Abstract While offspring size is a widely studied concept in evolutionary ecology, mechanisms affecting offspring phenotype in species with postzygotic parental care are incompletely understood. We examined the impact of sibling fusion on ontogenetic shifts in offspring size in the brooding sea anemone Urticina felina. Fusion occurred among brood-protected embryos in U. felina, whereas it occurred postrelease among settlers of corals studied here and previously. Two fusion products were evidenced: morphologically aberrant offspring and large homogeneous offspring coined “megalarvae.” The frequent occurrence (∼77%) of megalarvae identifies them as the primary fusion product, which drove an increase in offspring size and within-clutch size variation before release. Lipid signatures suggest that morphologically aberrant juveniles represent by-products that do not reach adulthood. Not only were occurrences of megalarvae common in the populations studied, they increased with maternal fecundity, suggesting that sibling fusion may be a form of kin cooperation integral to the reproductive success of U. felina, warranting investigation in other live-bearing invertebrate taxa.

Notes and References

This item contains 41 references.

Literature Cited
  • ['Allen, R.\n M., Y. M. Buckley, and D. J. Marshall. 2008. Offspring size plasticity in\n response to intraspecific competition: an adaptive maternal effect across\n life-history stages. American Naturalist 171:225–237.']
  • ['Amar, K.\n O., N. E. Chadwick, and B. Rinkevich. 2008. Coral kin aggregations exhibit mixed\n allogeneic reactions and enhanced fitness during early ontogeny. BMC\n Evolutionary Biology 8:126–135.']
  • ['Beklemishev, W. N. 1969. Principles of comparative anatomy of invertebrates.\n Vol. 1. Promorphology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.']
  • ['Bernardo,\n J. 1996. The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size:\n patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. American Zoologist\n 36:216–236.']
  • ['Buss, L. W.\n 1982. Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility.\n Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA\n 79:5337–5341.']
  • ['Charnov, E.\n L., and S. K. M. Ernest. 2006. The offspring-size/clutch-size trade off in\n mammals. American Naturalist 167:578–582.']
  • ['Chia, F. S.\n 1976. Sea anemone reproduction: patterns and adaptive radiations. Pages\n 261–270 in G. O. Mackie, ed. Coelenterate biology and\n behavior. Plenum, New York.']
  • ['Chia, F.\n S., and J. G. Spaulding. 1972. Development and juvenile growth of the sea\n anemone, Tealia crassicornis. Biological Bulletin\n 142:206–218.']
  • ['Crespi, B.,\n and C. Semeniuk. 2004. Parent-offspring conflict in the evolution of vertebrate\n reproductive mode. American Naturalist 163:635–653.']
  • ['Davy, S.\n K., and J. R. Turner. 2003. Early development and acquisition of zooxanthellae\n in the temperate symbiotic sea anemone Anthopleura ballii\n (Cocks). Biological Bulletin 205:66–72.']
  • ['Einum, S.,\n and I. A. Fleming. 2004. Environmental unpredictability and offspring size:\n conservative vs. diversified bet-hedging. Evolutionary Ecology Research\n 6:443–455.']
  • ['Feldgarden,\n M., and P. O. Yund. 1992. Allorecognition in colonial marine invertebrates: does\n selection favor fusion with kin of fusion with self? Biological Bulletin\n 182:155–158.']
  • ['Folse, H.\n J., and J. Roughgarden. 2010. What is an individual organism? a multilevel\n selection perspective. Quarterly Review of Biology 85:447–472.']
  • ['Hayward, P.\n J., and J. S. Ryland. 1990. The marine fauna of the British Isles and north-west\n Europe. Vol. 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Clarendon,\n Oxford.']
  • ['Hendry, A.\n P., T. Day, and A. B. Cooper. 2001. Optimal size and number of propagules:\n allowance for discrete stages and effects ofmaternal size on reproductive output\n and offspring fitness. American Naturalist 157:387–407.']
  • ['Jorgensen,\n C., S. K. Auer, and D. N. Reznick. 2011. A model for optimal offspring size in\n fish, including live-bearing and parental effects. American Naturalist\n 177:E119–E135.']
  • ['Kamel, S.\n J., F. X. Oyarzun, and R. K. Grosberg. 2010. Reproductive biology, family\n conflict, and size of offspring in marine invertebrates. Integrative and\n Comparative Biology 50:619–629.']
  • ['Krist, M.\n 2011. Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds. Biological\n Reviews 86:692–716.']
  • ['Marshall,\n D. J., R. Bonduriansky, and L. F. Bussiere. 2008. Offspring size variation\n within broods as a bet-hedging strategy in unpredictable environments. Ecology\n 89:2506–2517.']
  • ['Marshall,\n D. J., and M. J. Keough. 2007. The evolutionary ecology of offspring size in\n marine invertebrates. Advances in Marine Biology 53:1–60.']
  • ['McClary, D.\n J., and P. V. Mladenov. 1990. Brooding biology of the sea star Pteraster\n militaris (OF Müller): energetic and histological evidence for\n nutrient translocation to brooded juveniles. Journal of Experimental Marine\n Biology and Ecology 142:183–199.']
  • ['Mercier,\n A., Z. Sun, and J.-F. Hamel. 2011. Internal brooding favours pre-metamorphic\n chimerism in a non-colonial cnidarian, the sea anemone Urticina\n felina. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\n 278:3517–3522.']
  • ['Neves, E.\n G., and F. L. da Silveira. 2003. Release of planula larvae, settlement and\n development of Siderastrea stellata Verrill, 1868 (Anthozoa,\n Scleractinia). Hydrobiologia 501:139–147.']
  • ['Parrish, C.\n C. 1999. Determination of total lipid, lipid classes, and fatty acids in aquatic\n samples. Pages 4–20 in M. T. Arts and B. C. Wainmann,\n eds. Lipids in freshwater ecosystems. Springer, New York.']
  • ['Parrish, C.\n C., J. S. Wells, Z. Yang, and P. Dabinett. 1998. Growth and lipid composition of\n scallop juveniles, Placopecten magellanicus, fed the flagellate\n Isochrysis galbana with varying lipid composition and the\n diatom Chaetoceros muelleri. Marine Biology\n 133:461–471.']
  • ['Pineda-Krch, M., and K. Lehtilä. 2004. Costs and benefits of genetic\n heterogeneity within organisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology\n 17:1167–1177.']
  • ['Pollux, B.\n J. A., and D. N. Reznick. 2011. Matrotrophy limits a female’s ability to\n adaptively adjust offspring size and fecundity in fluctuating environments.\n Functional Ecology 25:747–756.']
  • ['Reeve, H.\n K. 1989. The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. American Naturalist\n 133:407–435.']
  • ['Rinkevich,\n B. 2000. A critical approach to the definition of Darwinian units of selection.\n Biological Bulletin 199:231–240.']
  • ['Santelices,\n B. 1999. How many kinds of individual are there? Trends in Ecology &\n Evolution 14:152–155.']
  • ['Scott, A.,\n and P. L. Harrison. 2007. Embryonic and larval development of the host sea\n anemones Entacmaea quadricolor and Heteractis\n crispa. Biological Bulletin 213:110–121.']
  • ['Sinervo, B.\n 1990. The evolution of maternal investment in lizards: an experimental and\n comparative analysis of egg size and its effects on offspring performance.\n Evolution 44:279–294.']
  • ['Smith, C.\n C., and S. D. Fretwell. 1974. The optimal balance between size and number of\n offspring. American Naturalist 108:499–506.']
  • ['Solé-Cava, A. M., J. P. Thorpe, and J. G. Kaye. 1985. Reproductive\n isolation with little genetic divergence between Urticina\n (=Tealia) felina and U.\n eques (Anthozoa: Actiniaria). Marine Biology\n 85:279–284.']
  • ['Sun, Z.\n 2009. Reproductive biology of deep-sea soft corals in the Newfoundland and\n Labrador region. MSc thesis. Memorial University, St. John’s,\n Newfoundland.']
  • ['Sun, Z.,\n J.-F. Hamel, and A. Mercier. 2009. Planulation of deep-sea octocorals in the NW\n Atlantic. Coral Reefs 28:781.']
  • ['———. 2010. Planulation periodicity, settlement preferences\n and growth of two deep-sea octocorals from the northwest Atlantic. Marine\n Ecology Progress Series 410:71–87.']
  • ['———. 2011. Reproduction and early growth of the deep-sea soft\n corals Gersemia fruticosa and Duva florida\n (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea). Invertebrate Biology 130:91–99.']
  • ['Trivers, R.\n L. 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist\n 14:249–264.']
  • ['Uller, T.\n 2008. Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends in\n Ecology & Evolution 23:432–438.']
  • ["Van\n Ofwegen, L., M. Grasshoff, and J. Van der Land. 2001. Octocorallia (excl.\n Pennatulacea). Pages 104–105 in M. J. Costello, C.\n Emblow, and R. J. White, eds. European register of marine species: a check-list\n of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their\n identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50. Muséum National\n d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris."]