You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Countability Effect: Comparative versus Experiential Reactions to Reward Distributions
Jingjing Ma and Neal J. Roese
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 39, No. 6 (April 2013), pp. 1219-1233
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668087
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Countability, Fairness, Statistical distributions, Food consumption, Happiness, Bottles, Cooking oils, Social comparison, Food economics, Experiment design
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The effect of inequity on satisfaction—people who are underbenefited are less satisfied than those who are overbenefited—is robust across many domains. However, various factors may moderate this effect, and a key perspective centers on value sensitivity. The present research demonstrates that countability (how easily a product or service can be counted using simple whole numbers) feeds into value sensitivity and thus moderates the impact of inequity on satisfaction. Across nine experiments, we show that when rewards are less easily counted, the effect of inequity on satisfaction is diminished. Further, this effect is rooted to a mechanism in which less countable rewards shift cognitive focus from value comparison to consumption experience. This research contributes to literature on value sensitivity, comparative thinking, numerical information processing, fairness, and happiness.
© 2012 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.