Male Superiority in Spatial Navigation: Adaptation or Side Effect?

Edward K. Clint, Elliott Sober, Theodore Garland Jr. and Justin S. Rhodes
The Quarterly Review of Biology
Vol. 87, No. 4 (December 2012), pp. 289-313
DOI: 10.1086/668168
Stable URL:
Page Count: 25
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:


Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Male Superiority in Spatial Navigation: Adaptation or Side Effect?
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


ABSTRACTIn the past few decades, sex differences in spatial cognition have often been attributed to adaptation in response to natural selection. A common explanation is that home range size differences between the sexes created different cognitive demands pertinent to wayfinding in each sex and resulted in the evolution of sex differences in spatial navigational ability in both humans and nonhuman mammals. However, the assumption of adaptation as the appropriate mode of explanation was nearly simultaneous with the discovery and subsequent verification of the male superiority effect, even without any substantive evidence establishing a causal role for adaptation. An alternate possibility that the sex difference in cognition is a genetic or hormonal side effect has not been rigorously tested using the comparative method. The present study directly evaluates how well the range hypothesis fits the available data on species differences in spatial ability by use of a phylogenetically based, cross-species, comparative analysis. We find no support for the hypothesis that species differences in home range size dimorphism are positively associated with parallel differences in spatial navigation abilities. The alternative hypothesis that sex differences in spatial cognition result as a hormonal side effect is better supported by the data.

Notes and References

This item contains 118 references.

  • ['Adkins R. M., Gelke E. L., Rowe D., Honeycutt R. L. 2001. Molecular phylogeny and divergence time estimates for major rodent groups: evidence from multiple genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:777–791.']
  • ['Aleman A., Bronk E., Kessels R. P. C., Koppeschaar H. P. F., van Honk J. 2004. A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29:612–617.']
  • ['Al-kahtani M. A., Zuleta C., Caviedes-Vidal E., Garland T., Jr. 2004. Kidney mass and relative medullary thickness of rodents in relation to habitat, body size, and phylogeny. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77:346–365.']
  • ['Andreano J. M., Cahill L. 2009. Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning and Memory 16:248–266.']
  • ['Astur R. S., Ortiz M. L., Sutherland R. J. 1998. A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: a large and reliable sex difference. Behavioural Brain Research 93:185–190.']
  • ['Blair W. F. 1942. Size of home range and notes on the life history of the woodland deer-mouse and eastern chipmunk in northern Michigan. Journal of Mammalogy 23:27–36.']
  • ['Blomberg S. P., Garland T., Jr. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:899–910.']
  • ['Blomberg S. P., Garland T., Jr., Ives A. R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745.']
  • ['Burkitt J., Widman D., Saucier D. M. 2007. Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men. Hormones and Behavior 51:649–654.']
  • ['Choi M. H., Yoo Y. S., Chung B. C. 2001. Biochemical roles of testosterone and epitestosterone to 5α-reductase as indicators of male-pattern baldness. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 116:57–61.']
  • ['Clark P. J., Brzezinska W. J., Puchalski E. K., Krone D. A., Rhodes J. S. 2009. Functional analysis of neurovascular adaptations to exercise in the dentate gyrus of young adult mice associated with cognitive gain. Hippocampus 19:937–950.']
  • ['Clark P. J., Kohman R. A., Miller D. S., Bhattacharya T. K., Brzezinska W. J., Rhodes J. S. 2011. Genetic influences on exercise-induced adult hippocampal neurogenesis across 12 divergent mouse strains. Genes, Brain and Behavior 10:345–353.']
  • ['Costa S. S., Andrade R., Carneiro L. A., Gonçalves E. J., Kotrschal K., Oliveira R. F. 2011. Sex differences in the dorsolateral telencephalon correlate with home range size in blenniid fish. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 77:55–64.']
  • ['Cox R. M., Skelly S. L., John-Alder H. B. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57:1653–1669.']
  • ['Cutrera A. P., Antinuchi C. D., Mora M. S., Vassallo A. I. 2006. Home-range and activity patterns of the South American subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum. Journal of Mammalogy 87:1183–1191.']
  • ['Day L. B., Guerra M., Schlinger B. A., Rothstein S. I. 2008. Sex differences in the effects of captivity on hippocampus size in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater obscurus). Behavioral Neuroscience 122:527–534.']
  • ['Deaner R. O., Nunn C. L. 1999. How quickly do brains catch up with bodies? A comparative method for detecting evolutionary lag. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences 266:687–694.']
  • ['Driscoll I., Hamilton D. A., Yeo R. A., Brooks W. M., Sutherland R. J. 2005. Virtual navigation in humans: the impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Hormones and Behavior 47:326–335.']
  • ['Ecuyer-Dab I., Robert M. 2004a. Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition 91:221–257.']
  • ['Ecuyer-Dab I., Robert M. 2004b. Spatial ability and home-range size: examining the relationships in western men and women (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 118:217–231.']
  • ['Einon D. 1980. Spatial memory and response strategies in rats: age, sex and rearing differences in performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32:473–489.']
  • ['Erickson K. I., Voss M. W., Prakash R. S., Basak C., Szabo A., Chaddock L., Kim J. S., Heo S., Alves H., White S. M., Wojcicki T. R., Mailey E., Vieira V. J., Martin S. A., Pence B. D., Woods J. A., McAuley E., Kramer A. F. 2011. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:3017–3022.']
  • ['Felsenstein J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:445–471.']
  • ['FitzGerald R. W., Madison D. M. 1983. Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pinetorum. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13:183–187.']
  • ["Francis R. C. 2004. Why Men Won't Ask for Directions: The Seductions of Sociobiology. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press."]
  • ['Frick K. M., Burlingame L. A., Arters J. A., Berger-Sweeney J. 2000. Reference memory, anxiety and estrous cyclicity in C57BL/6NIA mice are affected by age and sex. Neuroscience 95:293–307.']
  • ['Galea L. A. M., Kimura D. 1993. Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences 14:53–65.']
  • ['Galea L. A. M., Kavaliers M., Ossenkopp K.-P., Innes D., Hargreaves E. L. 1994. Sexually dimorphic spatial learning varies seasonally in two populations of deer mice. Brain Research 635:18–26.']
  • ['Galea L. A. M., Kavaliers M., Ossenkopp K.-P., Hampson E. 1995. Gonadal hormone levels and spatial learning performance in the Morris water maze in male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Hormones and Behavior 29:106–125.']
  • ['Galis F., Ten Broek C. M. A., Van Dongen S., Wijnaendts L. C. D. 2010. Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior 39:57–62.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr. 1983. Scaling the ecological cost of transport to body mass in terrestrial mammals. American Naturalist 121:571–587.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr. 1999. Laboratory endurance capacity predicts variation in field locomotor behaviour among lizard species. Animal Behaviour 58:77–83.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr., Adolph S. C. 1994. Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiological Zoology 67:797–828.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr., Carter P. A. 1994. Evolutionary physiology. Annual Review of Physiology 56:579–621.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr., Harvey P. H., Ives A. R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18–32.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr., Dickerman A. W., Janis C. M., Jones J. A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42:265–292.']
  • ['Garland T., Jr., Bennett A. F., Rezende E. L. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology 208:3015–3035.']
  • ['Gaulin S. J. C., FitzGerald R. W. 1986. Sex differences in spatial ability: an evolutionary hypothesis and test. American Naturalist 127:74–88.']
  • ['Gaulin S. J. C., FitzGerald R. W. 1989. Sexual selection for spatial-learning ability. Animal Behaviour 37:322–331.']
  • ['Gaulin S. J. C., Hoffman H. 1988. Evolution and development of sex differences in spatial ability. Pages 129–152 in Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective, edited by L. Betzig, M. B. Mulder, and P. Turke. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.']
  • ['Gaulin S. J. C., FitzGerald R. W., Wartell M. S. 1990. Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species (Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 104:88–93.']
  • ['Getz L. L. 1961. Home ranges, territoriality, and movement of the meadow vole. Journal of Mammalogy 42:24–36.']
  • ['Gibson B. M., Kamil A. C. 2005. The fine-grained spatial abilities of three seed-caching corvids. Learning & Behavior 33:59–66.']
  • ['Gould S. J., Lewontin R. C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences 205:581–598.']
  • ['Hampson E., van Anders S. M., Mullin L. I. 2006. A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior 27:401–416.']
  • ['Harpending H. 1976. Regional Variations in !Kung Populations. Page 161 in Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers: Studies of the !Kang San and Their Neighbors, edited by R. B. Lee and I. DeVore. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.']
  • ['Harvey P. H., Pagel M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford (United Kingdom): Oxford University Press.']
  • ['Hayasaka K., Gojobori T., Horai S. 1988. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of primate mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5:626–644.']
  • ['Hewlett B., van de Koppel J. M. H., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. 1982. Exploration ranges of Aka pygmies of the Central African Republic. Man 17:418–430.']
  • ['Hubbert H. B. 1915. The Effect of Age on Habit Formation in the Albino Rat. Boston (Massachusetts): H. Holt and Company.']
  • ['Jaarola M., Martínková N., Gündüz I., Brunhoff C., Zima J., Nadachowski A., Amori G., Bulatova N. S., Chondropoulos B., Fraguedakis-Tsolis S., González-Esteban J., López-Fuster M. J., Kandaurov A. S., Kefeliog¨lu H., da Luz Mathias M., Villate I., Searle J. B. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the speciose vole genus Microtus (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33:647–663.']
  • ['Jonasson Z. 2005. Meta-analysis of sex differences in rodent models of learning and memory: a review of behavioral and biological data. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 28:811–825.']
  • ['Jones C. M., Braithwaite V. A., Healy S. D. 2003. The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behavioral Neuroscience 117:403–411.']
  • ['Jozet-Alves C., Modéran J., Dickel L. 2008. Sex differences in spatial cognition in an invertebrate: the cuttlefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences 275:2049–2054.']
  • ['Juraska J. M., Henderson C., Müller J. 1984. Differential rearing experience, gender, and radial maze performance. Developmental Psychobiology 17:209–215.']
  • ['Kamil A. C., Balda R. P., Olson D. J. 1994. Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in the radial-arm maze analog. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108:385–393.']
  • ['Karson M. A., Boal J. G., Hanlon R. T. 2003. Experimental evidence for spatial learning in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). Journal of Comparative Psychology 117:149–155.']
  • ['Kelly S. A., Panhuis T. M., Stoehr A. M. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity: molecular mechanisms and adaptive significance. Comprehensive Physiology DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c110008.']
  • ['Kritzer M. F., McLaughlin P. J., Smirlis T., Robinson J. K. 2001. Gonadectomy impairs T-maze acquisition in adult male rats. Hormones and Behavior 39:167–174.']
  • ['LaBuda C. J., Mellgren R. L., Hale R. L. 2002. Sex differences in the acquisition of a radial maze task in the CD-1 mouse. Physiology and Behavior 76:213–217.']
  • ['Lacreuse A., Kim C. B., Rosene D. L., Killiany R. J., Moss M. B., Moore T. L., Chennareddi L., Herndon J. G. 2005. Sex, age, and training modulate spatial memory in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience 119:118–126.']
  • ['Lamberty Y., Gower A. J. 1988. Investigation into sex-related differences in locomotor activity, place learning and passive avoidance responding in NMRI mice. Physiology and Behavior 44:787–790.']
  • ['Lavin S. R., Karasov W. H., Ives A. R., Middleton K. M., Garland T., Jr. 2008. Morphometrics of the avian small intestine, compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic perspective. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 81:526–550.']
  • ['Lawrence D., Shaw M., Katz M. 1986. Elevated free testosterone concentration in men and women with acne vulgaris. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 11:263–273.']
  • ['Lindburg D. G. 1969. Rhesus monkeys: mating season mobility of adult males. Science 166:1176–1178.']
  • ['Linklater W. L. 2000. Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae. Biological Reviews 75:1–20.']
  • ['Linklater W. L., Cameron E. Z., Stafford K. J., Veltman C. J. 2000. Social and spatial structure and range use by Kaimanawa wild horses (Equus caballus: Equidae). New Zealand Journal of Ecology 24:139–152.']
  • ['Linn M. C., Petersen A. C. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Development 56:1479–1498.']
  • ['Lloyd E. A. 2005. The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.']
  • ['Lund T. D., Lephart E. D. 2001. Manipulation of prenatal hormones and dietary phytoestrogens during adulthood alter the sexually dimorphic expression of visual spatial memory. BMC Neuroscience 2:21.']
  • ['MacDonald D. H., Hewlett B. S. 1999. Reproductive interests and forager mobility. Current Anthropology 40:501–524.']
  • ['Maguire E. A., Gadian D. G., Johnsrude I. S., Good C. D., Ashburner J., Frackowiak R. S. J., Frith C. D. 2000. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:4398–4403.']
  • ['Mann V. A., Sasanuma S., Sakuma N., Masaki S. 1990. Sex differences in cognitive abilities: a cross-cultural perspective. Neuropsychologia 28:1063–1077.']
  • ['Markowska A. L. 1999. Sex dimorphisms in the rate of age-related decline in spatial memory: relevance to alterations in the estrous cycle. Journal of Neuroscience 19:8122–8133.']
  • ['Masters M. S., Sanders B. 1993. Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics 23:337–341.']
  • ['Mastrangelo M. E., Schleich C. E., Zenuto R. R. 2010. Spatial learning abilities in males and females of the subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 22:101–108.']
  • ['Mikesic D., Drickamer L. 1992. Factors affecting home-range size in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) living in outdoor enclosures. American Midland Naturalist 127:31–40.']
  • ['Mishima N., Higashitani F., Teraoka K., Yoshioka R. 1986. Sex differences in appetitive learning of mice. Physiology and Behavior 37:263–268.']
  • ['Moffat S. D., Hampson E., Hatzipantelis M. 1998. Navigation in a “virtual” maze: sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 19:73–87.']
  • ['Montello D. R., Lovelace K. L., Golledge R. G., Self C. M. 1999. Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89:515–534.']
  • ['Morris R. 1984. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 11:47–60.']
  • ['Murphy J., Waldmann T., Arkins S. 2004. Sex differences in equine learning skills and visuo-spatial ability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87:119–130.']
  • ['Murphy W. J., Pringle T. H., Crider T. A., Springer M. S., Miller W. 2007. Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny. Genome Research 17:413–421.']
  • ['Nunn C. L. 2011. The Comparative Approach in Evolutionary Anthropology and Biology. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press.']
  • ["O'Connell J. F., Hawkes K. 1984. Food choice and foraging sites among the Alyawara. Journal of Anthropological Research 40:504–535."]
  • ['Olton D. S., Samuelson R. J. 1976. Remembrance of places passed: spatial memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2:97–116.']
  • ['Ophir A. G., Phelps S. M., Sorin A. B., Wolff J. O. 2007. Morphological, genetic, and behavioral comparisons of two prairie vole populations in the field and laboratory. Journal of Mammalogy 88:989–999.']
  • ['Owen K., Lynn R. 1993. Sex differences in primary cognitive abilities among blacks, Indians and whites in South Africa. Journal of Biosocial Science 25:557–560.']
  • ['Pacheco-Cobos L., Rosetti M., Cuatianquiz C., Hudson R. 2010. Sex differences in mushroom gathering: men expend more energy to obtain equivalent benefits. Evolution and Human Behavior 31:289–297.']
  • ['Pagel M. D. 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. Journal of Theoretical Biology 156:431–442.']
  • ['Postma A., Meyer G., Tuiten A., van Honk J., Kessels R. P. C., Thijssen J. 2000. Effects of testosterone administration on selective aspects of object-location memory in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25:563–575.']
  • ['Rezende E. L., Diniz-Filho J. A. F. 2012. Phylogenetic analyses: comparing species to infer adaptations and physiological mechanisms. Comprehensive Physiology 2:639–674.']
  • ['Rhodes J. S., van Praag H., Jeffrey S., Girard I., Mitchell G. S., Garland T., Jr., Gage F. H. 2003. Exercise increases hippocampal neurogenesis to high levels but does not improve spatial learning in mice bred for increased voluntary wheel running. Behavioral Neuroscience 117:1006–1016.']
  • ["Robert M., Chevrier E. 2003. Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen? Memory & Cognition 31:1136–1145."]
  • ['Roof R. L., Havens M. D. 1992. Testosterone improves maze performance and induces development of a male hippocampus in females. Brain Research 572:310–313.']
  • ['Sawrey D. K., Keith J. R., Backes R. C. 1994. Place learning by three vole species (Microtus ochrogaster, M. montanus, and M. pennsylvanicus) in the Morris swim task. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108:179–188.']
  • ['Scheid C., Bugnyar T. 2008. Short-term observational spatial memory in jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and ravens (Corvus corax). Animal Cognition 11:691–698.']
  • ['Shepard R. N., Metzler J. 1971. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703.']
  • ['Shu D.-G., Luo H.-L., Conway Morris S., Zhang X.-L., Hu S.-X., Chen L., Han J., Zhu M., Li Y., Chen L.-Z. 1999. Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China. Nature 402:42–46.']
  • ['Silverman I., Phillips K., Silverman L. K. 1996. Homogeneity of effect sizes for sex across spatial tests and cultures: implications for hormonal theories. Brain and Cognition 31:90–94.']
  • ['Silverman I., Choi J., Mackewn A., Fisher M., Moro J., Olshansky E. 2000. Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evolution and Human Behavior 21:201–213.']
  • ['Silverman I., Choi J., Peters M. 2007. The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior 36:261–268.']
  • ['Sober E. 2008. Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.']
  • ['Sober E., Wilson D. S. 2011. Adaptation and Natural Selection revisited. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24:462–468.']
  • ['Spritzer M. D., Meikle D. B., Solomon N. G. 2004. The relationship between dominance rank and spatial ability among male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 118:332–339.']
  • ['Spritzer M. D., Solomon N. G., Meikle D. B. 2005. Influence of scramble competition for mates upon the spatial ability of male meadow voles. Animal Behaviour 69:375–386.']
  • ['Steppan S. J., Adkins R. M., Anderson J. 2004. Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. Systematic Biology 53:533–553.']
  • ['Swallow J. G., Rhodes J. S., Garland T., Jr. 2005. Phenotypic and evolutionary plasticity of organ masses in response to voluntary exercise in house mice. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45:426–437.']
  • ['Trivers R. L. 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14:249–264.']
  • ['van Praag H., Kempermann G., Gage F. H. 1999. Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus. Nature Neuroscience 2:266–270.']
  • ['Voyer D., Voyer S., Bryden M. P. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin 117:250–270.']
  • ['Warren S. G., Juraska J. M. 2000. Sex differences and estropausal phase effects on water maze performance in aged rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 74:229–240.']
  • ['Webster A. B., Brooks R. J. 1981. Social behavior of Microtus pennsylvanicus in relation to seasonal changes in demography. Journal of Mammalogy 62:738–751.']
  • ['Whisson D. A., Quinn J. H., Collins K. C. 2007. Home range and movements of roof rats (Rattus rattus) in an old-growth riparian forest, California. Journal of Mammalogy 88:589–594.']
  • ['Williams C. L., Meck W. H. 1991. The organizational effects of gonadal steroids on sexually dimorphic spatial ability. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16:155–176.']
  • ['Williams C. L., Barnett A. M., Meck W. H. 1990. Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience 104:84–97.']
  • ['Williams G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.']
  • ['Zielinski W. J., Vandenbergh J. G. 1991. Increased survivorship of testosterone-treated female house mice, Mus musculus, in high-density field conditions. Animal Behaviour 42:955–967.']