You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Vol. 103, No. 4 (December 2012), pp. 735-742
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669046
Page Count: 8
ABSTRACTHistorians and commentators have long discussed tensions between specialist and lay expertise in the making of scientific knowledge. Such accounts have often described quarrels over the distribution of expertise in nineteenth-century “popular” and imperial sciences. The “crowdsourcing” of science on a global scale, however, arguably began in the early modern era. This essay examines the lists of specimen suppliers, the artifacts of a worldwide collecting campaign, published by the London apothecary James Petiver at the turn of the eighteenth century. Listing suppliers helped Petiver advertise his status as a global specimen broker in the Republic of Letters. However, publicly listing his sources drew criticism over the social character of his collecting project, while lists became synonymous with the debasement of learning in polemics over natural history.
© 2012 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.