You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Impact of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic on Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Care Center in New York City
Nahid Bhadelia MD MA, Rajiv Sonti MD, Jennifer Wright McCarthy MD, Jaclyn Vorenkamp MD MPH, Haomiao Jia PhD, Lisa Saiman MD MPH and E. Yoko Furuya MD MS
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 34, No. 8 (August 2013), pp. 825-831
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671271
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Influenza, Pandemics, Diseases, Epidemiology, Health care industry, Disease risk, Symptoms, H1N1 subtype influenza A virus, Emergency departments, Secretion
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Background and Objective. Assessing the impact of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) on healthcare workers (HCWs) is important for pandemic planning.Methods. We retrospectively analyzed employee health records of HCWs at a tertiary care center in New York City with influenza-like illnesses (ILI) and confirmed influenza from March 31, 2009, to February 28, 2010. We evaluated HCWs’ clinical presentations during the first and second wave of the pandemic, staff absenteeism, exposures among HCWs, and association between high-risk occupational exposures to respiratory secretions and infection.Results. During the pandemic, 40% (141/352) of HCWs with ILI tested positive for influenza, representing a 1% attack rate among our 13,066 employees. HCWs with influenza were more likely to have fever, cough, and tachycardia. When compared with the second wave, cases in the first wave were sicker and at higher risk of exposure to patients’ respiratory secretions (). HCWs with ILI—with and without confirmed influenza—missed on average 4.7 and 2.7 work days, respectively (). Among HCWs asked about working while ill, 65% (153/235) reported they did so (mean, 2 days).Conclusions. HCWs in the first wave had more severe ILI than those in the second wave and were more likely to be exposed to patients’ respiratory secretions. HCWs with ILI often worked while ill. Timely strategies to educate and support HCWs were critical to managing this population during the pandemic.
© 2013 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.